Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806424›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Factors affecting communication time in an emergency medical communication centers.

Melisande Bensoussan, Mathilde Vannier, Thomas Loeb, Jérémie Boutet, Frédéric Lapostolle, Paul-Georges Reuter

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melisande Bensoussan *Samu des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, 92380, France.
Mathilde Vannier *Samu des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, 92380, France.
Thomas LoebSamu des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, 92380, France.
Jérémie BoutetSamu des Hauts-de-Seine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Garches, 92380, France.
Frédéric LapostolleSAMU 93 - UF Recherche-Enseignement-Qualité, Université Paris 13, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Inserm U942, Hôpital Avicenne, 125, rue de Stalingrad, Bobigny, 93009, France.
Paul-Georges ReuterService des Urgences, SAMU, SMUR, CHU Pontchaillou, Université Rennes, Rennes, France. paul-georges.reuter@chu-rennes.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergency Medical Communication Centres (EMCCs) play a crucial role in emergency care by ensuring timely responses through telephone triage. However, extended communication times can impede accessibility, patient triage, and decision-making. Identifying the factors influencing communication duration is essential for improving EMCC efficiency.

objectiveThis study aims to identify temporal, human, and contextual factors associated with prolonged communication times in an EMCC where decision-making is conducted by physicians.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of all calls received at a French EMCC between March 1 and December 31, 2019. A total of 108,548 patient medical files were analyzed, excluding calls from medical personnel or hospitals. We examined the total communication time (from call initiation to decision) and the medical communication time (physician involvement). Bivariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with prolonged communication times.

resultsThe median total communication time was 7 min [IQR 5-11], and the median medical communication time was 3 min [IQR 2-4]. Psychiatric reasons for calling (OR = 1.75) and elderly patients (OR = 1.58) were associated with longer communication times. Calls leading to medical advice (OR = 1.48) and calls during weekends or nighttime were also significant factors. Conversely, calls for trauma or from nursing homes, and those handled by emergency physicians, were associated with shorter durations.

conclusionSeveral factors influence communication times in EMCCs, including patient demographics, reason for the call, and time of day.

Indexed as

CommunicationEmergency Medical Service Communication SystemsEmergency Medical ServicesTriageAdultAgedFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID39806424
PMCPMC11727792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.