Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806414›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

Understanding and addressing a 'difficult' family in ICU.

Victoria Metaxa, Flavio E Nacul, Anna Conway Morris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Victoria MetaxaDepartment of Critical Care, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Flavio E NaculCritical Care Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro and Pro-Cardiaco Hospital, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. fnacul@uol.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2281-8316
Anna Conway MorrisSpecialist Psychiatry Services Directorate, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conflicts between ICU staff and patient/relatives are common and are a source of additional stress in an already tense environment. These conflicts vary from disagreements to serious controversies, which may lead to legal process or even violence. Unsuccessful communication is recognised as a common denominator for such disagreements. Both conflict prevention and conflict management/resolution rely on understanding and addressing the main reasons behind it. Using a case-example, we propose a 'mentalisation-based' approach to family meetings may improve communication and decrease conflict.

Indexed as

FamilyIntensive Care UnitsProfessional-Family RelationsCommunicationHumansCommunicationConflict managementConflict resolutionFamily conflict

Identifiers

PMID39806414
PMCPMC11731561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.