Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806387›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2025

The potential of a population register for addressing health inequities: an observational study using data linkage to improve breast cancer screening enrolment and participation in Indigenous Māori women in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Phyu Sin Aye, Karen Bartholomew, Michael Walsh, Kathy Pritchard, Maree Pierce, Jenny Richards, Erin Chambers, Aroha Haggie, Jesse Solomon, Gabrielle Lord and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Phyu Sin AyeTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Service Improvement and Innovation, Auckland, New Zealand. Phyusin.aye@tewhatuora.govt.nz.
Karen BartholomewTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Service Improvement and Innovation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Michael WalshTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Service Improvement and Innovation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kathy PritchardTe Whatu Ora Counties Manukau (Lead Provider), Auckland, New Zealand.
Maree PierceTe Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jenny RichardsTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Service Improvement and Innovation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Erin ChambersTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Service Improvement and Innovation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Aroha HaggieMakaurau Consultants, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jesse SolomonTe Whatu Ora Waitematā, Auckland, New Zealand.
Gabrielle LordProCare Primary Health Organisation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Tiffany SoloaiNational Hauora Coalition, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lorraine SymonsTe Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority), Auckland, New Zealand.
Roimata TipeneTe Whatu Ora (Health New Zealand) Service Improvement and Innovation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Rawiri McKree JansenTe Aka Whai Ora (Māori Health Authority), Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer screening in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ) still has persistent inequitable coverage by ethnicity, especially for Indigenous Māori women. This project aimed to undertake systematic data linkage to identify and invite eligible Māori women to participate in breast screening.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in Northern New Zealand between 1/01/2020 and 30/06/2021. The BreastScreen Aotearoa (BSA) register was linked with the primary care data to identify and invite eligible Māori women (aged 45-69 years) to breast screening, who were not currently enrolled in BSA, and who were enrolled in BSA but had not been screened or overdue for breast screening. Invitations were sent through invitation letters, text messages and phone calls. Enrolment to BSA and screening participation at 15 and 18 months from the project's start date were reported.

resultsThrough the data linkage, 2295 women who were not enrolled in BSA were identified eligible for breast screening. Approximately half (n = 1086) of the women were contactable within 5 contact attempts. Of these contactable, 345 (32%) women were enrolled in BSA, 421 (39%) were screened at 15 months, increasing to 441 (41%) at 18 months from the project start. Among women who were previously enrolled but never screened or overdue for screening, 1470 women were eligible. Their contact details were updated through the data linkage, which facilitated BSA to contact them successfully for breast screening. Consequently, 305 (21%) of these eligible were screened at 15 months, and increased to 332 (23%) at 18 months.

conclusionsThe data linkage approach has evidenced the benefit of a population register to facilitate equitable access to breast screening services. Further work is needed on choices of combined approaches for optimising screening uptake equitably.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerMaori PeopleRegistriesAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMiddle AgedNew ZealandBreast cancerData linkageMāoriPopulation registerScreening

Identifiers

PMID39806387
PMCPMC11727381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.