Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806366›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Impacts of genomic alterations on the efficacy of HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Riqing Huang, Anqi Hu, Qixiang Rong, Ditian Shu, Meiting Chen, Wei Yang, Yue Zhang, Qiufan Zheng, Xin An, Cong Xue and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Response to Lehrer.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Learning Patient Similarity from Genomics for Precision Oncology.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Riqing Huang *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Anqi Hu *State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Qixiang RongState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Ditian ShuState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Meiting ChenState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Wei YangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Yue ZhangState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Qiufan ZhengState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Xin AnState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Cong XueState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China.
Haifeng LiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. lihf@sysucc.org.cn.
Yanxia ShiState Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, No.651 Dongfeng East Road, Guangzhou, 510060, People's Republic of China. shiyx@sysucc.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-5414-8049

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program 2021YFE0206300National Natural Science Foundation of China 81773279National Natural Science Foundation of China 82073391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have revolutionized the treatment landscape of metastatic breast cancer. However, the efficacy of these therapies may be compromised by genomic alterations. Hence, this study aims to identify factors predicting sensitivity to HER2 ADC in metastatic breast cancer.

methodsThis comprehensive real-world retrospective study collected clinical data from patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer and performed genomic profiling using targeted next-generation sequencing. The study analyzed the associations between genomic alterations and clinical outcomes of HER2 ADC treatment.

resultsSixty-three patients were included in this study, 33 with HER2-low breast cancer and 30 with HER2-positive breast cancer, respectively. The most frequently altered genes were TP53 (69%), PIK3CA (45%), MYC (35%), and ERBB2 (35%). Patients with amplifications in cell cycle-related genes showed inferior median progression-free survival (PFS) than those without amplifications (2.07 months vs. 8.40 months; HR = 5.24; 95% CI 2.11-13.01; p < 0.001), particularly in HER2-low patients (2.07 months vs. 8.27 months; HR = 4.23; 95% CI 1.50-11.91; p = 0.004). Additionally, ERBB2/CDK12 co-amplification exhibited a superior median PFS in all patients (19.33 months vs. 5.43 months; HR = 0.13; 95% CI 0.04-0.45; p < 0.001) and in HER2-positive patients (19.33 months vs. 6.87 months; HR = 0.18; 95% CI 0.05-0.72; p = 0.007). Multivariate analysis indicated that amplification in cell cycle-related genes was an independent predictor of inferior PFS (HR = 4.46; 95% CI 1.08-18.40; p = 0.039), while the presence of ERBB2/CDK12 co-amplification was independently correlated with superior PFS (HR = 0.16; 95% CI 0.04-0.65; p = 0.010).

conclusionsAmplification in cell cycle genes may contribute to primary resistance of HER2 ADC in HER2-low breast cancer. ERBB2/CDK12 co-amplification may be a potential biomarker for favorable responses in HER2-positive breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesGenomicsImmunoconjugatesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunoconjugatesAntibody–drug conjugateBreast cancerCDK12Cell cycle

Identifiers

PMID39806366
PMCPMC11730523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.