Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806360›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Bridging the gap: understanding the perspective of healthcare professional students towards precision medicine in a Nigerian tertiary institution (a cross-sectional study).

Ezinwanne Jane Ugochukwu, Jennifer Chinwe Edom, Faith Olanrewaju Omotayo, Agatha Adaeze Amaechi, Chinedu Benneth Obetta, Chibueze Anosike, AbdulMuminu Isah, Chukwuemeka Michael Ubaka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ezinwanne Jane UgochukwuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria. ezinwanne.ugochukwu@unn.edu.ng.
Jennifer Chinwe EdomDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Faith Olanrewaju OmotayoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Agatha Adaeze AmaechiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Chinedu Benneth ObettaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Chibueze AnosikeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.
AbdulMuminu IsahDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.
Chukwuemeka Michael UbakaDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacy Management, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Enugu State, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIndividuals often respond differently to medications, giving rise to the field of precision medicine (PM), which focuses on tailoring treatments to individual genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors. This study examined the level of comfort healthcare professional students have with their knowledge of precision medicine, alongside their attitudes and perceptions toward precision medicine, at a tertiary institution in Nigeria.

methodsA cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted among healthcare professional students (400-600 level) at the University of Nigeria Nsukka between January and March 2024. The data were analyzed via IBM Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) for Windows version 27. Descriptive analyses (frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation) and chi-square tests were used to summarize and compare the variables. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

resultsA total of 431 healthcare professional students participated in this study. Fewer than half (n = 200, 46.4%) were pharmacy students, and the majority were within the age range of 21-25 years (n = 288, 66.8%). Nearly half (n = 206, 47.8%) reported having information about precision medicine from the internet, and the majority (n = 341, 79.1%) expressed having an interest in a career involving research in precision medicine. More than half of the students (n = 240, 55.7%) were comfortable with their knowledge of precision medicine and had favourable attitudes (n = 236, 54.8%). Additionally, more than half had positive perceptions of ethical concerns (n = 216, 50.1%) and education in precision medicine (n = 239, 55.5%). Gender, age, department, level of study, awareness of PM, and interest in a career involving research were significantly associated with students' knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of precision medicine (p < 0.001).

conclusionHealthcare professional students were comfortable with their knowledge of PM and, in addition, had favourable attitudes and positive perceptions toward the use of precision medicine.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePrecision MedicineStudents, Health OccupationsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNigeriaSurveys and QuestionnairesTertiary Care CentersYoung AdultGenomic testingHealthcare professional studentsPersonalized medicinePharmacogenomicsPrecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID39806360
PMCPMC11730482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.