Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806340›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

What are parents' preferences for Human Papillomavirus vaccination promotion messages and communication? Application of a discrete choice experiment to a French Caribbean setting.

Frédérique G E Dorleans, Jonathan Sicsic, Valérie Henry, Isabelle Bonmarin, Gwladys Nadia Gbaguidi, Lucie Leon, Jocelyn Raude, Jacques Rosine, Judith E Mueller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Frédérique G E DorleansSanté Publique France Antilles, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France. frederique.dorleans@santepubliquefrance.fr.
Jonathan SicsicUniversité Paris Cité, LIRAES F75006, Paris, France.
Valérie HenrySanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Isabelle BonmarinSanté Publique France, Saint-Maurice, France.
Gwladys Nadia GbaguidiSanté Publique France Antilles, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France.
Lucie LeonSanté Publique France Antilles, Gourbeyre, Guadeloupe, France.
Jocelyn RaudeEcole des Hautes Etudes de Santé Publique, Rennes, France.
Jacques RosineSanté Publique France Antilles, Fort-de-France, Martinique, France.
Judith E MuellerEmerging Disease Epidemiology Unit, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 7572, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHuman Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine uptake in the French Caribbean has remained below 25% since introduction in 2007, which is well behind national and international targets. Using a discrete choice experiment (DCE), we explored parental preferences around HPV vaccination and optimized communication content in a sample of parents of middle-school pupils in Guadeloupe.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey in public and private middle age schools in Guadeloupe in June 2023 using an online questionnaire. Across a series of nine hypothetical scenarios, participants were asked to decide to vaccinate or not and how certain they were about this choice. Scenarios differed by five attributes (diseases characteristics, vaccine safety, health professionals or institutions promoting vaccination, social conformity and optimal vaccination age). We used random effect logit and linear regression models to estimate the effects of attribute levels on vaccine acceptance and vaccine eagerness.

resultsA total of 389 parents out of the 23,184 pupils' parents completed the DCE survey. The attributes with a significant effect size on theoretical vaccine acceptance were "social conformity" and "optimal vaccination age". Overall, the odds of scenarios stating high vaccine coverage in adolescents were at least 1.8 (95% CI: 1.2-2.6) times more likely to yield theoretical vaccine acceptance compared to a low vaccine uptake reference. The odds of providing scientific explanation along with age yielded theoretical vaccination acceptance respectively up to 3.2 times higher (95% CI: 1.7 to 6.1) in parents reporting an un vaccinated child and not intention to vaccinate. For vaccine eagerness, we observe significant positive effects of communication content overall when stating high vaccination uptake in adolescents or scientific evidence along with age or mentioning cancer prevention. Parents always refusing vaccination remained unsensitive to communication contents. DISCUSSION AND

conclusionThese original DCE results highlighted the need for tailoring specific HPV vaccination promotion communication in a French Caribbean setting. Contextual features such as sexuality concerns as regard to age and peers' adhesion to vaccination have to be thoroughly considered. The nationwide HPV vaccination campaign in middle schools should adapt communication in order to raise HPV vaccine uptake in the French Caribbean.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorHealth PromotionPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsVaccinationAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuadeloupeHuman Papillomavirus VirusesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CarePapillomavirus VaccinesDiscrete choice experimentFrench CaribbeanGuadeloupeHealth communicationHPV vaccinationHuman papillomavirusMartiniquePreferencesVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID39806340
PMCPMC11731421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.