ArticleBMC medical education2025
Current status and perceived challenges of collaborative research in a leading pharmacy college in Iraq: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive analysis of community pharmacists' practices, barriers, and strategies in patient education on Saxenda®: a qualitative study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2026Article
- Prescribing Errors in Iraqi Intensive and Cardiac Care Units: A Qualitative Investigations of Pharmacists' Perceptions, Determining Factors, Outcomes and Management Strategies.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Perceptions and experiences of community pharmacists about weight loss dietary supplements: a qualitative study.Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring Adherence, Treatment Experiences, and Quality of Healthcare Services in HIV Management Among Iraqi Patients: Challenges and Influential Factors.HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterdisciplinary collaboration among academic pharmacists is crucial for enhancing scientific research, discovering new drugs and modifying existing ones, besides solving pharmaceutical problems. This study aimed to explore the perception and experience of academic pharmacists regarding research collaboration.
methodsA qualitative study through one-to-one face-to-face interviews with faculty members at the University of Baghdad/College of Pharmacy was conducted from May to July/2023. Purposive and convenience strategies were used to enroll study participants. Thematic-analysis approach was used to analyze the data.
resultsTwenty-four faculty members were interviewed. Most participants were female with ≥ 10 years of academic experience. Five themes emerged from the obtained data. The first theme, entitled the collaborative research was conducted at three different levels: college, national, and to a lesser extent, international. The second theme was facilitators of collaborative research. This theme includes two subthemes the reasons behind research collaboration and the encouraging characteristics of the researcher. Seeking scientific and technical support were the main reported reasons behind domestic collaborations, while supervising postgraduate students was the main reason for international collaborations. The third theme was the barriers to collaborative research. The complicated-university laws, besides limited-resources & funds, were barriers to collaborative research. Academic workload was the main challenge for domestic collaborations, whereas poor professional-networking was the main challenge for international collaborations. Ethical challenge in collaborative research was the fourth study theme. The last theme was the recommendations to improve future research collaboration. In this regard, most participants recommended enhancing academics' research-skills, increasing research funding, and simplifying regulatory issues to improve collaborative research.
conclusionResearch collaborations occur at the domestic and, to a limited extent, at the international level. Academic workload, shortage of resources, and complicated university regulations are the main challenges for research collaborations. Enhancing research-skills, increasing research funding, and simplifying university regulations can improve research collaborations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.