Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806318›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Current status and perceived challenges of collaborative research in a leading pharmacy college in Iraq: a qualitative study.

Ehab Mudher Mikhael, Ali Azeez Al-Jumaili, Mohammed Yawuz Jamal, Zahraa Duraid Abdulazeez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ehab Mudher MikhaelClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq. ehab_pharma84@yahoo.com.
Ali Azeez Al-JumailiClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Mohammed Yawuz JamalClinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.
Zahraa Duraid AbdulazeezPharmaceutical Chemistry Department, College of Pharmacy, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInterdisciplinary collaboration among academic pharmacists is crucial for enhancing scientific research, discovering new drugs and modifying existing ones, besides solving pharmaceutical problems. This study aimed to explore the perception and experience of academic pharmacists regarding research collaboration.

methodsA qualitative study through one-to-one face-to-face interviews with faculty members at the University of Baghdad/College of Pharmacy was conducted from May to July/2023. Purposive and convenience strategies were used to enroll study participants. Thematic-analysis approach was used to analyze the data.

resultsTwenty-four faculty members were interviewed. Most participants were female with ≥ 10 years of academic experience. Five themes emerged from the obtained data. The first theme, entitled the collaborative research was conducted at three different levels: college, national, and to a lesser extent, international. The second theme was facilitators of collaborative research. This theme includes two subthemes the reasons behind research collaboration and the encouraging characteristics of the researcher. Seeking scientific and technical support were the main reported reasons behind domestic collaborations, while supervising postgraduate students was the main reason for international collaborations. The third theme was the barriers to collaborative research. The complicated-university laws, besides limited-resources & funds, were barriers to collaborative research. Academic workload was the main challenge for domestic collaborations, whereas poor professional-networking was the main challenge for international collaborations. Ethical challenge in collaborative research was the fourth study theme. The last theme was the recommendations to improve future research collaboration. In this regard, most participants recommended enhancing academics' research-skills, increasing research funding, and simplifying regulatory issues to improve collaborative research.

conclusionResearch collaborations occur at the domestic and, to a limited extent, at the international level. Academic workload, shortage of resources, and complicated university regulations are the main challenges for research collaborations. Enhancing research-skills, increasing research funding, and simplifying university regulations can improve research collaborations.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorFaculty, PharmacySchools, PharmacyAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicIraqMaleQualitative ResearchAcademic pharmacistsChallengesResearch collaboration

Identifiers

PMID39806318
PMCPMC11730822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.