ArticleBMC medical education2025
Voices on academic accreditation: lived experiences of nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni in nursing education.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The interplay between job-related factors of career development and organizational resilience among academic nurse educators: a mixed-methods study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Using AI in healthcare education: a rapid review and commentary.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Effects of NCAAA Accreditation on Health Sciences Educational Programs: Faculty Experiences at KSAU-HS.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
- Psychological distress, self-efficacy, and academic advising among Saudi nursing students during academic reform: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Preparing for Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-International accreditation: exploring approaches, insights and learning experiences through accreditation journey of residency program.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Article
- Enablers and barriers in the professional development of nurses employed full-time at university nursing studies in Croatia: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Strengthening theoretical assessment design in nursing education: Advancing SDG 4.Health SA = SA Gesondheid · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcademic accreditation is a pivotal process in nursing education, ensuring program quality, consistency, and graduate readiness for professional practice. Despite its significance, limited research explores the lived experiences and perspectives of stakeholders, including academic nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni-engaged in accreditation. PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences, perceptions, and insights of nursing education stakeholders regarding the accreditation process, focusing on its impact on educational quality, program reputation, and professional preparation.
methodsA qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, using purposive sampling to recruit 54 participants from a Saudi nursing college, including academic nurse educators and administrators (n = 24), students (n = 20), and alumni (n = 10). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews.Thematic analysis identified key themes and subthemes associated with participants' experiences of accreditation.
findingsSix main themes emerged: (1) knowledge and experience of accreditation; (2) importance and benefits of accreditation; (3) impact of accreditation; (4) preparation for professional practice; (5) challenges of accreditation; and (6) suggestions for improvement. Stakeholders across all groups recognized accreditation as essential for program quality and career readiness. Faculty and alumni emphasized the role of accreditation in enhancing program reputation and credibility, while students highlighted its influence on their learning experiences, though they expressed a desire for more engagement and transparency in the process. Faculty and administrators reported significant challenges, including administrative demands, time management, and resource allocation in maintaining accreditation standards.
conclusionThis study offers a comprehensive view of accreditation's multi-dimensional impact from multiple stakeholder perspectives and experiences, reinforcing accreditation's importance in promoting nursing education quality and alignment with healthcare standards. However, findings suggest a need for institutional support to manage accreditation demands effectively. Future research should investigate accreditation's long-term impact through longitudinal and multi-site studies to broaden understanding and enhance the generalizability of findings in nursing education contexts worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.