Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39806315›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2025

Voices on academic accreditation: lived experiences of nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni in nursing education.

Ebtsam Aly Abou Hashish, Hend Alnajjar, Hawazen Rawas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Using AI in healthcare education: a rapid review and commentary.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ebtsam Aly Abou HashishCollege of Nursing - Jeddah, King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, P.O.Box.9515, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia. ebtsam_ss@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0492-7615
Hend AlnajjarCollege of Nursing - Jeddah, King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, P.O.Box.9515, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia.
Hawazen RawasCollege of Nursing - Jeddah, King Saud Bin Abdul-Aziz University for Health Sciences, P.O.Box.9515, Jeddah, 21423, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcademic accreditation is a pivotal process in nursing education, ensuring program quality, consistency, and graduate readiness for professional practice. Despite its significance, limited research explores the lived experiences and perspectives of stakeholders, including academic nurse educators, administrators, students, and alumni-engaged in accreditation. PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences, perceptions, and insights of nursing education stakeholders regarding the accreditation process, focusing on its impact on educational quality, program reputation, and professional preparation.

methodsA qualitative phenomenological approach was employed, using purposive sampling to recruit 54 participants from a Saudi nursing college, including academic nurse educators and administrators (n = 24), students (n = 20), and alumni (n = 10). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews.Thematic analysis identified key themes and subthemes associated with participants' experiences of accreditation.

findingsSix main themes emerged: (1) knowledge and experience of accreditation; (2) importance and benefits of accreditation; (3) impact of accreditation; (4) preparation for professional practice; (5) challenges of accreditation; and (6) suggestions for improvement. Stakeholders across all groups recognized accreditation as essential for program quality and career readiness. Faculty and alumni emphasized the role of accreditation in enhancing program reputation and credibility, while students highlighted its influence on their learning experiences, though they expressed a desire for more engagement and transparency in the process. Faculty and administrators reported significant challenges, including administrative demands, time management, and resource allocation in maintaining accreditation standards.

conclusionThis study offers a comprehensive view of accreditation's multi-dimensional impact from multiple stakeholder perspectives and experiences, reinforcing accreditation's importance in promoting nursing education quality and alignment with healthcare standards. However, findings suggest a need for institutional support to manage accreditation demands effectively. Future research should investigate accreditation's long-term impact through longitudinal and multi-site studies to broaden understanding and enhance the generalizability of findings in nursing education contexts worldwide.

Indexed as

AccreditationEducation, NursingFaculty, NursingNurse AdministratorsStudents, NursingAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSaudi ArabiaAccreditationCareer ReadinessEducational standardsHealthcare TrainingNursing educationProfessional DevelopmentProgram QualityQualitative studySaudi ArabiaStakeholder perspectives

Identifiers

PMID39806315
PMCPMC11731556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.