ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Evaluation of double-balloon enteroscopy in the management of type 1 small bowel vascular lesions (angioectasia): a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic and Clinical Impact of Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Small-Bowel Inflammatory Lesions: A Retrospective Cohort Study in a Turkish Population.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Double Balloon Enteroscopy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Small Bowel Varices.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSmall-bowel angioectasia is commonly diagnosed and managed using double-balloon enteroscopy; however, rebleeding rates can vary significantly. This study aimed to identify and evaluate the clinical predictors of rebleeding in patients with small-bowel angioectasia.
methodsThis retrospective study focused on adult patients who underwent endoscopic management for small bowel vascular lesions (SBVLs). A total of 67 patients were included in the study, all of whom were retrospectively analyzed. The SBVLs were classified using the Yano et al. classification system. Among these, 62 patients with angioectasia who received endoscopic treatment were specifically analyzed. To further investigate the clinical outcomes, the angioectasia group that required endoscopic treatment was divided into two subgroups based on the number of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) procedures performed. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were used to establish which predictor variables were significantly related to the recurrence.
resultsA total of 67 patients (mean age 68.1 ± 8.9 years; 44 males) with SBVL, angioectasia was diagnosed in 62 (92.5%) patients, dieulafoy lesion in 1 (1.5%) patient, and arteriovenous malformation in 4 (6%) patients. Similarly, the prevalence of chronic renal failure and diabetes mellitus were significantly higher in the multiple DBE endotherapy group compared to the single DBE endotherapy group (p < 0.001; p = 0.032, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, anticoagulant use (OR = 9.648, 95% CI: 1.729-53.817, p = 0.010), chronic renal failure (OR = 15.683, 95% CI: 2.727-90.203, p = 0.002), localization of duodenum (OR = 13.509, 95% CI: 1.598-114.168, p = 0.017), and localization of the ileum (OR = 17.100, 95% CI: 1.477-197.905, p = 0.023) were all independently associated with a higher risk of angioectasia recurrence.
conclusionsThe findings of this study demonstrates a high success rate of endoscopic treatment, with a rebleeding rate of 27%, highlighting the significance of this approach. Chronic renal failure, use of anticoagulant, and lesion localization in the duodenum or ileum were identified as independent risk factors for rebleeding, underscoring the need for careful patient monitoring and targeted intervention in these cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.