SynthesisBMC cancer2025
Safety and efficacy of anti-CD30 CAR-T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- CD30 CAR-T cells in combination with anti-PD-1 camrelizumab in relapsed/refractory CD30Journal of translational medicine · 2026Trial
- Inhibition of glycosphingolipid synthesis overcomes the steric hindrance of CD30 N-glycans to augment CD30-targeted immunotherapeutic efficacy.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2026Article
- Predictors of sensitivity to immune therapies in classic Hodgkin lymphoma.Blood neoplasia · 2026Review
- Emerging therapeutic strategies for CD30-positive lymphomas.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Today.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2026Review
- CD30 as a Target Molecule in the Diagnosis and Therapy of Lymphomas.American journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Put the CAR-T before the HRS: Advances in Anti-CD30 Immunotherapy Targeting Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg Cells in Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Rising transfusion rates amidst stable blood supply: A Canadian perspective on emerging challenges for blood operators.Transfusion · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRelapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) remains challenging to treat, and anti-CD30 chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy may be effective. This meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of anti-CD30 CAR-T cell therapy for treating R/R cHL.
methodsA systematic literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science databases was conducted until February 2024. The odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) was analysed using Review Manager 5.4. Outcomes including overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) were extracted for meta-analysis. We used the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) to evaluate the quality of the included literature.
resultsA total of 151 participants from 8 records were included. Meta-analysis showed the ORR of CD30 CAR-T cell therapy for R/R cHL was 57% (95%CI 0.36-0.76, P = 0.50), with a CR of 34% (95%CI 0.13-0.64, P = 0.29) and a PR of 32% (95%CI 0.15-0.55, P = 0.12). With the median follow-up range from 9.5 to 71.5 months, the 1-year PFS was 39% (95% CI 0.30-0.49, P = 0.04), and the 1-year OS was 89% (95% CI 0.65-0.97, P = 0.005). The most common hematologic AE was leukopenia (72%, 95% CI: 0.50-0.87), and the most common non-hematological AE was cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (43%, 95% CI: 0.14-0.76). The grade ≥ 3 AEs was 66% (95%CI 0.06-0.98, I2 = 93%, P = 0.70), 34% (95%CI 0.07-0.78, I2 = 85%, P = 0.51) in neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively. All AEs were tolerable and resolved with treatment.
conclusionCurrent evidence suggests that anti-CD30 CAR-T cell therapy is effective and safe in treating R/R cHL and is worth considering as a viable therapeutic option.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.