SynthesisBMC cancer2025
Diagnosis and prognosis of melanoma from dermoscopy images using machine learning and deep learning: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Skin Lesion and Cancer Detection Using Computer Vision: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- CBAM-Xception: An Attention-Guided Framework for Skin Cancer Classification.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Hierarchical Deep Learning Framework for Skin Disease and Cancer Classification Performance Enhancement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- An Optimal Deep Hybrid Framework with Selective Kernel U-Net for Skin Lesion Detection and Classification.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Multimodal skin care system using combined image and impedance-based diagnostics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Emerging Artificial Intelligence Models for Estimating Breslow Thickness from Dermoscopic Images.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Explainable ensemble transfer learning for skin lesion classification with multi-method explainability validation.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Prospective cohort study assessing the efficacy of dermoscopy-guided combination therapy using COFrontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Translating Features to Findings: Deep Learning for Melanoma Subtype Prediction.Dermatopathology (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Metastatic Melanoma Prognosis Prediction Using a TC Radiomic-Based Machine Learning Model: A Preliminary Study.Cancers · 2025Article
- Insights into Liposomal and Gel-Based Formulations for Dermatological Treatments.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Assessing the Efficacy of the Spectrum-Aided Vision Enhancer (SAVE) to Detect Acral Lentiginous Melanoma, Melanoma In Situ, Nodular Melanoma, and Superficial Spreading Melanoma: Part II.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Enhancing skin lesion classification: a CNN approach with human baseline comparison.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- YOLOv10-based detection of melanocytic nevi: reverse exclusion optimization for melanoma screening.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Dermoscopic Characteristics in Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis.Journal of skin cancer · 2025Article
- A novel deep semantic- and vision-based self-attention architecture for skin cancer classification.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMelanoma is a highly aggressive skin cancer, where early and accurate diagnosis is crucial to improve patient outcomes. Dermoscopy, a non-invasive imaging technique, aids in melanoma detection but can be limited by subjective interpretation. Recently, machine learning and deep learning techniques have shown promise in enhancing diagnostic precision by automating the analysis of dermoscopy images.
methodsThis systematic review examines recent advancements in machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) applications for melanoma diagnosis and prognosis using dermoscopy images. We conducted a thorough search across multiple databases, ultimately reviewing 34 studies published between 2016 and 2024. The review covers a range of model architectures, including DenseNet and ResNet, and discusses datasets, methodologies, and evaluation metrics used to validate model performance.
resultsOur results highlight that certain deep learning architectures, such as DenseNet and DCNN demonstrated outstanding performance, achieving over 95% accuracy on the HAM10000, ISIC and other datasets for melanoma detection from dermoscopy images. The review provides insights into the strengths, limitations, and future research directions of machine learning and deep learning methods in melanoma diagnosis and prognosis. It emphasizes the challenges related to data diversity, model interpretability, and computational resource requirements.
conclusionThis review underscores the potential of machine learning and deep learning methods to transform melanoma diagnosis through improved diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Future research should focus on creating accessible, large datasets and enhancing model interpretability to increase clinical applicability. By addressing these areas, machine learning and deep learning models could play a central role in advancing melanoma diagnosis and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.