ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2025
Advances in surgical management of chronic lymphedema: current strategies and future directions.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Debulking" the future of lymphedema surgery: A narrative review.JPRAS open · 2026Review
- Factors associated with lymphedema therapist willingness to refer to surgery.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Lymphedema: current treatment strategies and future directions in tissue engineering.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Technology-enhanced compression and AI-integrated lymphedema care: a narrative review.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Review
- Epigenetic reprogramming via EZH2 inhibition rescues fibroadipose pathogenesis in secondary lymphedema through activating PPARγ signaling.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- Microsurgical Lymphatic Vessel Transplantation for Chronic Lymphedema: Long-Term Evaluation of Volume Reduction and Lymphatic Transport Kinetics.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Identification of novel hub genes and pathways predictive of fibrosis progression in cancer-related lymphedema through integrated multi-omics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lymphedema is a chronic condition caused by the accumulation of protein-rich fluid in the interstitial tissue, resulting in edema and a diminished quality of life. When first-line treatments like complete decongestive therapy (CDT) fail, surgical options are considered. These include physiological procedures like lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), which aim to restore lymphatic function, as well as reductive procedures such as liposuction and excisional techniques, which reduce limb volume. Previous studies have evaluated these surgeries, but the literature remains scattered. This rapid review consolidates current research on surgical treatments for lymphedema. We reviewed the PubMed database and included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, and literature reviews published between 2014 and 2024. Studies were selected if they reported outcomes such as objective volume reduction, patient-reported quality of life (QOL), or infection rates. Nineteen publications were selected for review. The most common procedures represented were LVA (N = 12) and VLNT (N = 10), though reductive operations such as liposuction and radical excision were also represented. Both LVA and VLNT, either alone or combined, demonstrated positive outcomes in terms of volume reduction, QOL, and infection prevention. Reductive surgeries were effective in reducing long-term volume but had less favorable cosmetic outcomes and variable infection rates. Overall, while surgical approaches have proven beneficial, the variability in outcome measures and inconsistent follow-up periods limit comparability across studies. Further research is needed to better guide patients in selecting the most appropriate surgical option based on their lymphedema characteristics and personal goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.