ArticleOral radiology2025
A novel deep learning-based pipeline architecture for pulp stone detection on panoramic radiographs.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning-Based Automated Diagnostic Charting on Panoramic Radiography: Comparison of YOLOv11 and YOLOv12.Odontology · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in the detection of dental pulp calcifications: a scoping review.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of CNN architectures for detection of dental pulp calcifications on CBCT slices.Science progressArticle
- Transfer learning models in the detection of pulp calcifications- A preliminary study.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPulp stones are ectopic calcifications located in pulp tissue. The aim of this study is to introduce a novel method for detecting pulp stones on panoramic radiography images using a deep learning-based two-stage pipeline architecture. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe first stage involved tooth localization with the YOLOv8 model, followed by pulp stone classification using ResNeXt. 375 panoramic images were included in this study, and a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics, including precision, recall, false-negative rate, false-positive rate, accuracy, and F1 score was employed to rigorously assess the performance of the proposed architecture.
resultsDespite the limited annotated training data, the proposed method achieved impressive results: an accuracy of 95.4%, precision of 97.1%, recall of 96.1%, false-negative rate of 3.9%, false-positive rate of 6.1%, and a F1 score of 96.6%, outperforming existing approaches in pulp stone detection.
conclusionsUnlike current studies, this approach adopted a more realistic scenario by utilizing a small dataset with few annotated samples, acknowledging the time-consuming and error-prone nature of expert labeling. The proposed system is particularly beneficial for dental students and newly graduated dentists who lack sufficient clinical experience, as it aids in the automatic detection of pulpal calcifications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature that propose a pipeline architecture to address the PS detection tasks on panoramic images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39806222What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.