ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Automated Incidental Findings Notification Through the Electronic Health Record Utilizing Dictation Macros.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study is to implement an actionable incidental findings (AIFs) communication workflow integrated into the electronic health record (EHR) using dictation macros to improve the quality of radiology reports and facilitate delivery of findings to clinicians. The workflow was implemented across an academic multi-hospital health system and used by over 100 radiologists from 12 divisions. Standardized macros were created for different organ systems including the thyroid, lungs, liver, pancreas, spleen, kidney, female reproductive, and others, designed based on the ACR Novel Quality Measure Set. All macros contained special codes enabling automated notification of clinicians in Epic EHR and unique codes to allow for tracking. When notified, clinicians can fast track ordering of follow-up imaging exams. All alerts were monitored by radiology operations who ensured messages were acknowledged within 73 h. From September 2023 to March 2024, 12,919 AIFs alerts were filed for 10,766 patients. Median age was 65 years, and 63.6% were female and 36.4% were male. Most alerts were submitted for outpatients (73.5%), and a majority originated from CT exams (57.3%) followed by radiographs (12.2%) and ultrasound (11.5%). Number of submissions per radiologist ranged from 0 to 930 with a median of 62. Median time to alert acknowledgment was 8.1 h, and 93.9% were acknowledged within 73 h. Follow-up orders were placed for 62.3% of patients. A standardized AIFs communication workflow utilizing dictation macros can help facilitate delivery of findings and follow-up recommendations to clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.