ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Design and validation of a simulation-based training module for ileo-transverse intracorporeal anastomosis.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a simulation-based laparoscopic ventral rectopexy module: skills training for minimally invasive pelvic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Advanced Simulation System for Orbitozygomatic Fracture Reconstruction: Multicenter Validation of a Novel Training and Objective Assessment Platform.Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe benefits of the totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy have been established, but its adoption has been limited by the challenges of intracorporeal suturing. While simulation is effective for training advanced surgical skills, no dedicated simulation-based course exists for intracorporeal ileo-transverse anastomosis (ICA). This study aimed to develop and validate a simulation module for training in ICA.
methodsThis study employed a proof-of-concept design for an educational tool. Key aspects of the anastomosis were identified using the team's surgical experience, surgical videos, and existing evidence. Surgeons were recruited to test and refine successive simulation models through an iterative process until a functional prototype was achieved and assessed. Subsequently, surgeons with varying experience levels were invited to perform an ICA in the model. Performance was evaluated by two blinded surgeons through video recordings, utilizing a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS), a Specific Rating Score (SRS), and operative time measurements. Non-parametric descriptive and analytical methods were applied, with results presented as median [IQR].
resultsAn ex vivo based model was developed. Seventeen participants evaluated the model. Eighty-three percent declared acceptable or maximum fidelity regarding the colon. Resemblance to the surgical scenario in terms of ergonomic and anatomical similarity was highlighted. All participants found the model useful to train intracorporeal suturing. Thirteen subjects performed the ICA. Experts achieved significantly higher OSATS scores (22.3 [22-22.5] vs 18 [16-19.5]; p = .013), exhibited a trend toward higher SRS, and obtained shorter operative times (21.5 vs 36 min; p = .039).
conclusionAn ex vivo simulation module for ICA was developed, demonstrating acceptable fidelity in replicating the surgical environment. The simulated scenario could successfully distinguish between levels of surgical experience, as evidenced by significant differences in OSATS scores and operative times, thereby confirming its construct validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39806177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.