ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2025
Survival After Orbital Exenteration for Primary Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Survival outcomes after orbital exenteration for recurrent or previously treated orbital malignancies: impact of margin status and metastatic spread.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocally advanced periorbital cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) may require orbital exenteration, which is highly morbid. As immunotherapy develops, orbit preservation may become widespread, and data benchmarking survival with current standard-of-care surgery and radiotherapy are essential to the integration of this emerging method into modern treatment paradigms. This study aimed to determine the survival of patients after orbital exenteration for cSCC and investigate contributing factors. It was hypothesized that postoperative radiotherapy would be associated with improved survival.
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of patients with T3 and T4 cSCC undergoing orbital exenteration. Survival analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards.
resultsThe study enrolled 40 patients with a median age of 61.5 years who met the criteria. None of the patients had received preoperative radiotherapy. Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.09; p = 0.019) and residual disease (HR, 9.00; p = 0.003) were associated with worse survival. Postoperative radiotherapy (HR, 0.003; p < 0.001) was associated with improved survival. Perineural, lymphovascular, and bony invasion and T and N stage were not associated with survival. Survival with postoperative radiotherapy was 94 % at 1 year, 87 % at 2 years, and 84 % at 5 years.
conclusionsThe oncologic outcomes of orbital exenteration with postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cSCC are good. However, amelioration of the morbidity caused by resection of the eye would be ideal. Data to support immunotherapy as a sole therapy are currently limited, but a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and surgical treatment may facilitate orbit-preserving treatment in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.