ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2025
Perioperative changes in anxiety and comfort in third molar extraction patients sedated with midazolam.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preoperative Anxiolysis in Surgical Care Without Sedation or General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Association between preoperative anxiety, intraoperative discomfort, and postoperative pain across different dental extraction types: a prospective observational study.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to analyze changes in anxiety and comfort levels at each perioperative stage during third molar extraction under single-agent intravenous midazolam sedation, and to clarify how these conditions at each perioperative stage affect postoperative satisfaction. PATIENTS AND
method115 who requested extraction of 1 ~ 4 third molars under single-agent intravenous midazolam sedation were targeted. These patients were administered a questionnaire survey one week after surgery. The questionnaire's five items (Anxiety before surgery, Comfort during surgery, Comfort after surgery, Amnesia, and Satisfaction) were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS). We investigated the correlation between each of the eight parameters which added age, operation time, and total amount of midazolam, to the VAS score. Furthermore, we compared each eight parameters according to the number of extracted wisdom teeth and sex differences.
resultsRegarding the correlation among each parameter, low preoperative anxiety were weak and positively correlated with reduced operation time reduced midazolam dosage, and an increase in postoperative comfort. All parameters influenced the patient's satisfaction level. Those levels were significantly affected by preoperative reassurance (r = 0.4402, p < 0.01), postoperative comfort (r = 0.5522, p < 0.01) amnesia (r = 0.5741, p < 0.01), and intraoperative comfort (r = 0.7578, p < 0.01). Each parameter had no significant difference depending on the number of teeth extracted. In comparison between men and women, only preoperative reassurance was significantly lower in women than in men (p<0.05). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This sedation effectively managed preoperative anxiety and improved postoperative satisfaction. To obtain good sedative condition, Preoperative anxiolytics are recommended. This sedation is considered particularly effective in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39806035What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.