ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Clinical characteristics and prognostic analysis of patients with hydrocephalus after hypertensive cerebral haemorrhage: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progress in the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic hydrocephalus.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with hydrocephalus after hypertensive cerebral haemorrhage (HICH) and to analyse the relevant factors affecting the prognosis. A total of 500 patients with HICH admitted to the neurosurgery department of The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2020 and July 2024 were retrospectively analysed. The clinical data of the patients were collected, the occurrence of hydrocephalus within 3 months after discharge was followed up, and the patients were divided into the occurrence group and the non-occurrence group. Logistic regression analysis was applied to identify risk factors for hydrocephalus, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the predictive value of these factors. Among 500 patients, 45 (9%) developed hydrocephalus, with an average age of 59.93 ± 14.20 years in the occurrence group and 61.76 ± 12.28 years in the non-occurrence group. Logistics univariate analysis showed that the brain haemorrhage location, cerebral hernia, haematoma volume and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score were the influencing factors for hydrocephalus after HICH (P < 0.05). The results of logistics multivariate analysis showed that cerebral hernia (odds ratio [OR] = 3.102, 95% CI: 1.315-7.204) and the GCS score (OR = 1.732. 95% CI: 1.102-2.401) were risk factors for the development of hydrocephalus after HICH (P < 0.05). The ROC curve analysis showed an area under the curve of 0.639 for cerebral hernia, 0.713 for the GCS score and 0.794 for their combination in predicting hydrocephalus. Cerebral hernia and the GCS score are independent influencing factors of hydrocephalus after HICH, and the combination of the two can better predict the formation of hydrocephalus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39806031What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.