ArticleProtoplasma2025
Structural considerations and differences between leaf canals and secretory cavities in Asteraceae.
Article in Protoplasma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From cavities to canals: evidence of developmental continuity in Myrsine guianensis (Primulaceae).Journal of plant research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Secretory canals are distributed among seed plants, and their diversity is concentrated in many families of angiosperms, while other internal secretory structures such as secretory cavities have been identified only in Rutaceae, Myrtaceae, and Asteraceae. Identifying and recognizing these two types of secretory structures has been complicated, mainly due to their structural similarities. In this study, the ontogeny of canals and secretory cavities in two species of Asteraceae are described and compared, to understand the structural differences between them and allow the establishment of more appropriate homology hypotheses. Leaves of Bidens odorata and Tagetes tenuifolia in different stages of development, including the apex of the stems, were collected. The samples were processed using the methacrylate technique, and longitudinal and transverse sections were made. The development of both, canals and secretory cavities, is schizogenous, in contrast to what was previously reported for other families such as Rutaceae, where they are reported as lysigenous. In Asteraceae, canals originate from cells of the procambium while cavities originate from cells of the ground meristem. The structural and developmental similarities between both types of secretory structures allow us to infer that they have a close evolutionary origin. Canals and secretory cavities in Asteraceae can be differentiated based on the number of strata of secretory epithelium and sheath, the modifications of epidermal cells and mesophyll, and the type of promeristem that gives rise to them. Probably extravascular canals give rise to cavities in leaves of Asteraceae and probably in other plant families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.