ArticleScientific reports2025
Application research of convolutional neural network and its optimization in lightning electric field waveform recognition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Study on Multi-Station Identification Technology of Lightning Electromagnetic Pulses (LEMPs) Based on Deep Learning.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Review of Three-Dimensional Electric Field Sensors.Micromachines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quickly identifying and classifying lightning waveforms is the foundation of lightning forecasting and early warning. In this paper, based on the electric field observation of the Beijing lightning location website of the Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, a recognition and classification method of pulse signal waveform based on Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) algorithm is designed and implemented. The CNN network model and its parameters were optimized from three aspects: dataset, model parameters, and network structure, achieving a recognition rate of over 90%. The effects of various optimization terms and their different optimization orders on the training time of the model were studied. The results indicate that the CNN algorithm is suitable for the classification and recognition of lightning electric field (LEF) waveforms. Optimization can significantly improve recognition rate. The optimization method of fitting idealized waveforms can reduce noise in the dataset and significantly improve recognition rate, indicating that noise has a significant impact on waveform recognition. Therefore, it is necessary to perform noise preprocessing before recognition. The optimization has a huge impact on training efficiency, increasing training time by about 51% after optimization, but the influence of optimization order on it can be ignored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.