ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Hierarchical skin lesion image classification with prototypical decision tree.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal Deep Learning with Attention-Based Fusion for Skin Cancer Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hypergraph-based contrastive embedding and attention fusion for detection of skin cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional disease classification models often disregard the clinical significance of misclassifications and lack interpretability. To overcome these challenges, we propose a hierarchical prototypical decision tree (HPDT) for skin lesion classification. HPDT combines prototypical networks and decision trees, leveraging a class hierarchy to guide interpretable predictions from general to specific categories. By incorporating a hierarchy-based distance matrix, the model prioritizes less severe misclassifications while maintaining diagnostic accuracy. Evaluated on a dataset of 235,268 dermoscopic images across 65 conditions, HPDT outperforms flat classifiers and existing hierarchical methods in accuracy, error severity reduction, and interpretability. It also generalizes effectively to unseen classes. These results highlight the value of integrating clinical hierarchies into model design and training to improve diagnostic reliability and decision transparency, demonstrating HPDT's potential for clinical decision support.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.