ArticleScientific reports2025
Titin fragment is a sensitive biomarker in Duchenne muscular dystrophy model mice carrying full-length human dystrophin gene on human artificial chromosome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Assessment of muscle damage in patients with advanced Duchenne muscular dystrophy based on serum creatinine and the height-to-creatinine ratio.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Urinary titin represents an exciting biomarker for assessment of muscle health.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2025Review
- Serum protein biomarker signature of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.European journal of translational myology · 2025Article
- Extracellular vesicle signatures from eye lavage as novel non-invasive biomarkers for hypoxic ischaemic insult-findings from a neonatal mouse model.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
- Serum titin/creatinine ratio as a biomarker for discriminating disease severity in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked recessive disorder caused by mutations of the dystrophin gene, which spans 2.4 Mb on the X chromosome. Creatine kinase (CK) activity in blood and titin fragment levels in urine have been identified as biomarkers in DMD to monitor disease progression and evaluate therapeutic intervention. However, the difference in the sensitivity of these biomarkers in DMD remains unclear. Previously, we generated transchromosomic mice carrying the full-length human dystrophin gene on a human artificial chromosome (DYS-HAC1) vector. The human dystrophin derived from DYS-HAC1 improved pathological phenotypes observed in DMD-null mice, which lack the entire 2.4 Mb of the dystrophin gene. In this study, we compared the values of plasma CK activity and urine/plasma titin fragment levels in wild-type (WT), DYS-HAC1, DMD-null, and DYS-HAC1; DMD-null mice. Plasma CK activity and urine/plasma titin fragment levels in DMD-null mice were significantly higher than those in WT mice. Although plasma CK activity showed no significant difference between WT and DYS-HAC1; DMD-null mice, urine/plasma titin fragment levels in DYS-HAC1; DMD-null mice were higher than those in WT mice. Human dystrophin in DYS-HAC1; DMD-null mice drastically improved muscular dystrophy phenotypes seen in DMD-null mice; however, the proportion of myofibers with central nuclei in DYS-HAC1; DMD-null mice had a tendency to be slightly higher than that in WT mice. These results suggest that urine/plasma titin fragment levels could be a more sensitive biomarker than plasma CK activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.