ArticleScientific reports2025
Fine tuning enzyme activity assays for monitoring the enzymatic hydrolysis of PET.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic optimization and characterization of bacterial depolymerization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) plastics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Efficient Chemical Recycling of Polyester in Plastic Waste: A Heated High-Ethanol Alkaline Aqueous Process.Organic process research & development · 2026Article
- Bionanocomposite of Dual Antioxidant and Protease Function by Co-Immobilization of Tannic Acid and Papain on Anionic Clays.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Efficient monitoring of the enzymatic PET-hydrolysis is crucial for developing novel plastic-degrading biocatalysts. Herein, we aimed to upgrade in terms of accuracy the analytical methods useful for monitoring enzymatic PET-degradation. For the HPLC-based assessment, the incorporation of an internal standard within the analytic procedure enabled a more accurate quantification of the overall TPA content and the assessment of molar distributions and relative content of each aromatic degradation product. The provided calibration curves cover a broad concentration range, from µM to low mM scale, facilitating assessment of both lower and higher PETase activities, with a limit of detection positioned below the reported PET-degrading activities. The increased reproducibility and accuracy of the improved HPLC method, compared to the previous methods, was supported by lower dispersion of product concentrations and their lower deviation from theoretical values over multiple measurements. The other predominantly employed UV-spectroscopy assay was also improved in terms of employed wavelength and medium extinction coefficient of the three aromatic degradation products, while being cross-validated by the improved HPLC method. Finally, both methods were used for monitoring the product formation within the leaf-branch compost cutinase (LCC)-mediated PET-hydrolysis and provided individual time-productivity profiles for each aromatic degradation product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.