Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39805922›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Survival and prognostic factors among different types of liposarcomas based on SEER database.

Jiaqi Zhao, WenLi Du, XiaoLiang Tao, AiAi Li, Yi Li, Shuai Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Liposarcoma: State of the Art-A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Features of MR Imaging that Differentiate between Immunohistochemically Diagnosed Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma and Myxoid Liposarcoma.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiaqi ZhaoOrthopedics Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
WenLi DuEmergency Department, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Sichuan Province, Luzhou City, China.
XiaoLiang TaoOrthopedics Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
AiAi LiOrthopedics Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Yi LiOrthopedics Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shuai ZhangOrthopedics Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, China. zhangshuai20030@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to elucidate the disparities in survival and risk factors among different subtypes of liposarcoma, through analysis of epidemiological and prognostic data. The study cohort consisted of 12,822 patients diagnosed with liposarcoma in the United States between 2000 and 2021, whose data were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The prognosis for different subtypes of liposarcoma and the associated factors such as age, tumor stage, intervention, gender, tumor grade, location, size, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, were retrieved from the database. Well-differentiated liposarcoma demonstrated the most favorable prognosis, with 5-year and 10-year survival rates of 82% and 68%, respectively, followed by myxoid liposarcoma, pleomorphic liposarcoma and dedifferentiated liposarcoma, which exhibited the poorest prognosis. Advanced age, higher tumor stage, and the absence of surgical intervention were associated with inferior survival outcomes across all subtypes. Male gender, higher pathological grade, and primary tumor sites outside the extremities were identified as risk factors for the prognosis of subtypes other than pleomorphic liposarcoma. Larger tumor size was an indicator of a worse prognosis in subtypes other than well-differentiated liposarcoma. Chemotherapy was a risk factor for the prognosis of well-differentiated and myxoid liposarcomas but had no significant correlation with the prognosis of pleomorphic and dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Radiotherapy served as a protective factor for the prognosis of subtypes other than well-differentiated liposarcoma. Survival and prognostic factors vary among the major subtypes of liposarcoma, necessitating individualized analysis for each subtype. Poorer outcomes can be anticipated in the dedifferentiated and pleomorphic subtypes, while well-differentiated and myxoid liposarcomas exhibit relatively favorable prognoses.

Indexed as

LiposarcomaAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsSEER ProgramSurvival RateUnited StatesYoung AdultLiposarcomaPrognosisSEER databaseSubtypes

Identifiers

PMID39805922
PMCPMC11729850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.