Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39805864›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Contributions of distractor dwelling, skipping, and revisiting to age differences in visual search.

Iris Wiegand, Mariska van Pouderoijen, Joukje M Oosterman, Kay Deckers, Gernot Horstmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iris WiegandDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Postbus 9102, 6500 HC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. iris.wiegand@donders.ru.nl.
Mariska van PouderoijenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Postbus 9102, 6500 HC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joukje M OostermanDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Postbus 9102, 6500 HC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kay DeckersAlzheimer Centrum Limburg, Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gernot HorstmannDepartment of Psychology, Bielefeld University, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek MOCIA 17611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual search becomes slower with aging, particularly when targets are difficult to discriminate from distractors. Multiple distractor rejection processes may contribute independently to slower search times: dwelling on, skipping of, and revisiting of distractors, measurable by eye-tracking. The present study investigated how age affects each of the distractor rejection processes, and how these contribute to the final search times in difficult (inefficient) visual search. In a sample of Dutch healthy adults (19-85 years), we measured reaction times and eye-movements during a target present/absent visual search task, with varying target-distractor similarity and visual set size. We found that older age was associated with longer dwelling and more revisiting of distractors, while skipping was unaffected by age. This suggests that increased processing time and reduced visuo-spatial memory for visited distractor locations contribute to age-related decline in visual search. Furthermore, independently of age, dwelling and revisiting contributed stronger to search times than skipping of distractors. In conclusion, under conditions of poor guidance, dwelling and revisiting have a major contribution to search times and age-related slowing in difficult visual search, while skipping is largely negligible.

Indexed as

AgingAttentionVisual PerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsEye MovementsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReaction TimeYoung AdultAge-related slowingCognitive ageingDistractor rejectionEye-movementsSelective attentionTarget-distractor similarity

Identifiers

PMID39805864
PMCPMC11730621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.