ArticleGenome research2025
Characterization of the role of spatial proximity of DNA double-strand breaks in the formation of CRISPR-Cas9-induced large structural variations.
Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural variations (SVs) play important roles in genetic diversity, evolution, and carcinogenesis and are, as such, important for human health. However, it remains unclear how spatial proximity of double-strand breaks (DSBs) affects the formation of SVs. To investigate if spatial proximity between two DSBs affects DNA repair, we used data from 3C experiments (Hi-C, ChIA-PET, and ChIP-seq) to identify highly interacting loci on six different chromosomes. The target regions correlate with the borders of megabase-sized topologically associated domains (TADs), and we used CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease and pairs of single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) against these targets to generate DSBs in both K562 cells and H9 human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) was used to quantify the resulting recombination events, and high-throughput sequencing was used to analyze the chimeric junctions created between the two DSBs. We observe a significantly higher formation frequency of deletions and inversions with DSBs in proximity compared with deletions and inversions with DSBs not in proximity in K562 cells. Additionally, our results suggest that DSB proximity may affect the ligation of chimeric deletion junctions. Taken together, spatial proximity between DSBs is a significant predictor of large-scale deletion and inversion frequency induced by CRISPR-Cas9 in K562 cells. This finding has implications for understanding SVs in the human genome and for the future application of CRISPR-Cas9 in gene editing and the modeling of rare SVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.