Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39805669›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025

AI-Generated Synthetic STIR of the Lumbar Spine from T1 and T2 MRI Sequences Trained with Open-Source Algorithms.

Alice M L Santilli, Mark A Fontana, Erwin E Xia, Zenas Igbinoba, Ek Tsoon Tan, Darryl B Sneag, J Levi Chazen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial Intelligence in Planning for Spine Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alice M L SantilliFrom the Orthopedic Data Innovation Lab (ODIL) (A.M.L.S., M.A.F.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York santillia@hss.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5206-1727
Mark A FontanaFrom the Orthopedic Data Innovation Lab (ODIL) (A.M.L.S., M.A.F.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0529-9035
Erwin E XiaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging (E.E.X., Z.I., E.T.T., D.B.S., J.L.C.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Zenas IgbinobaDepartment of Radiology and Imaging (E.E.X., Z.I., E.T.T., D.B.S., J.L.C.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Ek Tsoon TanDepartment of Radiology and Imaging (E.E.X., Z.I., E.T.T., D.B.S., J.L.C.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-2847-9378
Darryl B SneagDepartment of Radiology and Imaging (E.E.X., Z.I., E.T.T., D.B.S., J.L.C.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9105-5415
J Levi ChazenDepartment of Radiology and Imaging (E.E.X., Z.I., E.T.T., D.B.S., J.L.C.), Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6146-2191

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeLumbar spine MRIs can be time consuming, stressful for patients, and costly to acquire. In this work, we train and evaluate open-source generative adversarial network (GAN) to create synthetic lumbar spine MRI STIR volumes from T1 and T2 sequences, providing a proof-of-concept that could allow for faster MRI examinations. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 1817 MRI examinations with sagittal T1, T2, and STIR sequences were accumulated and randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets. A GAN was trained to create synthetic STIR volumes by using the T1 and T2 volumes as inputs, optimized with the validation set, and then applied to the test set. Acquired and synthetic test set volumes were independently evaluated in a blinded, randomized fashion by 3 radiologists specializing in musculoskeletal imaging and neuroradiology. Readers assessed image quality, motion artifacts, perceived likelihood of the volume being acquired or synthetic, and the presence of 7 pathologies.

resultsThe optimal model leveraged a customized loss function that accentuated foreground pixels, achieving a structural similarity imaging metric of 0.842, mean absolute error of 0.028, and peak signal-to-noise ratio of 26.367. Radiologists could distinguish synthetic from acquired volumes; however, the synthetic volumes were of equal or better quality in 77% of test patients and demonstrated equivalent or decreased motion artifacts in 78% of test patients. For common pathologies, the synthetic volumes had high positive predictive value (75%-100%) but lower sensitivity (0%-67%).

conclusionsThis work links objective computer vision performance metrics and subject clinical evaluation of synthetic spine MRIs by using open-source and reproducible methodologies. High-quality synthetic volumes are generated, reproducing many important pathologies and demonstrating a potential means for expediting imaging protocols.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLumbar VertebraeMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39805669
PMCPMC11979812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.