ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
AI-Generated Synthetic STIR of the Lumbar Spine from T1 and T2 MRI Sequences Trained with Open-Source Algorithms.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seeing the Risk in Virtual Fat-Suppressed Spine MRI: External Benchmarking and Uncertainty-Guided Selective Risk Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Planning for Spine Surgery.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeLumbar spine MRIs can be time consuming, stressful for patients, and costly to acquire. In this work, we train and evaluate open-source generative adversarial network (GAN) to create synthetic lumbar spine MRI STIR volumes from T1 and T2 sequences, providing a proof-of-concept that could allow for faster MRI examinations. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 1817 MRI examinations with sagittal T1, T2, and STIR sequences were accumulated and randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets. A GAN was trained to create synthetic STIR volumes by using the T1 and T2 volumes as inputs, optimized with the validation set, and then applied to the test set. Acquired and synthetic test set volumes were independently evaluated in a blinded, randomized fashion by 3 radiologists specializing in musculoskeletal imaging and neuroradiology. Readers assessed image quality, motion artifacts, perceived likelihood of the volume being acquired or synthetic, and the presence of 7 pathologies.
resultsThe optimal model leveraged a customized loss function that accentuated foreground pixels, achieving a structural similarity imaging metric of 0.842, mean absolute error of 0.028, and peak signal-to-noise ratio of 26.367. Radiologists could distinguish synthetic from acquired volumes; however, the synthetic volumes were of equal or better quality in 77% of test patients and demonstrated equivalent or decreased motion artifacts in 78% of test patients. For common pathologies, the synthetic volumes had high positive predictive value (75%-100%) but lower sensitivity (0%-67%).
conclusionsThis work links objective computer vision performance metrics and subject clinical evaluation of synthetic spine MRIs by using open-source and reproducible methodologies. High-quality synthetic volumes are generated, reproducing many important pathologies and demonstrating a potential means for expediting imaging protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.