Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39805567›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID2025

'I Don't Think I Have Ever Worked Harder on a Case': Needs of Canadian Child Protection Workers and Parents With Intellectual Disabilities.

Munazza Tahir, Virginie Cobigo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Munazza TahirSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Virginie CobigoSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current literature has established that prejudice in child protection cases with parents with intellectual disabilities continues to persist. However, complexities of these cases are not well-understood from the perspective of child protection workers. This study aimed to identify the needs of child protection workers and their views on factors that influence supports for parents with intellectual disabilities.

methodThis qualitative study conducted semistructured interviews with child protection workers who have worked directly with parents with intellectual disabilities across five child protective agencies in three regions in Ontario, Canada (n = 11).

resultsThree major themes emerged after content analysis of interviews: (1) training and support needs of child protection workers; (2) key sources of support for parents; and (3) intersecting factors impacting decision-making.

conclusionSocial service agencies continue to be fragmented and better coordination across agencies is needed to meet the cross-sectoral needs of parents with intellectual disabilities.

Indexed as

Child Protective ServicesIntellectual DisabilityParentsAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntarioQualitative Researchchild protectionintersecting social factorsintersectoral collaborationparents with intellectual disabilitiessupports for parents with intellectual disabilitiestraining needs of child protection workers

Identifiers

PMID39805567
PMCPMC11729718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.