ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
The CeHRes Roadmap 2.0: Update of a Holistic Framework for Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of eHealth Technologies.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Testing two digital stress-management interventions in a randomized controlled trial of breast cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- A Responsible AI Readiness Framework for Digital Self-Management Platforms: Illustrative Application to a Rule-Based GERD Platform.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Refining acceptance and commitment therapy in daily life (ACT-DL) for clinical care: Optimization and mixed-methods evaluation of usability and implementation feasibility.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Inclusive and Collaborative Exergame for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: Development and Usability Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- Centering Equity During Health Technology Innovation: Scoping Review of Methods and Research Adjustments to Promote Inclusive Coproduction.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The Use of Speculative Fiction in Future-Focused Health Care Research.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Integrating Gait Analysis and AI Into Knee Osteoarthritis Care: Protocol for a 3-Phase Participatory Qualitative Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Interorganizational Mechanisms for Developing and Implementing Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: Exploratory, Qualitative Case Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- A practical step-by-step approach for patient and public involvement in eHealth intervention research: Lessons learned from three case projects.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- Article
- Digital health tools and point solutions-pitfalls in population health program measurement.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- User acceptance and continuance intention of the BeSt age mHealth application for physical activity promotion and fall prevention in nursing homes.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Stakeholder perspectives on machine learning models predicting diabetic foot ulcers and amputations in diabetes care: a scenario-based interview study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- WMRE2030: integrating wearable devices, multi-omics, and artificial intelligence-driven real-time feedback into a daily-scale closed-loop framework for a new era of precision exercise.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- An Evaluation of the Evidence on Mobile Health Applications for Mental Health, Substance Use and Delinquency in Justice-Involved Adults and Youth: a Scoping Review.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2025Article
- Understanding Acceptability of AI Triage Tools Amongst Underserved Populations: Lessons From the Early Phases of Co-Production With Bangladeshi Communities in Birmingham, UK.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Systematic review of dynamically tailored eHealth interventions targeting physical activity and healthy diet in chronic disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Value-Based Experiences Related to Digital Follow-Up Services Among Critical Care Survivors: An International Qualitative Study.Nursing & health sciences · 2025Article
- Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Perspectives on Remote Patient Monitoring in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation Management: Initiating Cocreation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To ensure that an eHealth technology fits with its intended users, other stakeholders, and the context within which it will be used, thorough development, implementation, and evaluation processes are necessary. The CeHRes (Centre for eHealth and Wellbeing Research) Roadmap is a framework that can help shape these processes. While it has been successfully used in research and practice, new developments and insights have arisen since the Roadmap's first publication in 2011, not only within the domain of eHealth but also within the different disciplines in which the Roadmap is grounded. Because of these new developments and insights, a revision of the Roadmap was imperative. This paper aims to present the updated pillars and phases of the CeHRes Roadmap 2.0. The Roadmap was updated based on four types of sources: (1) experiences with its application in research; (2) literature reviews on eHealth development, implementation, and evaluation; (3) discussions with eHealth researchers; and (4) new insights and updates from relevant frameworks and theories. The updated pillars state that eHealth development, implementation, and evaluation (1) are ongoing and intertwined processes; (2) have a holistic approach in which context, people, and technology are intertwined; (3) consist of continuous evaluation cycles; (4) require active stakeholder involvement from the start; and (5) are based on interdisciplinary collaboration. The CeHRes Roadmap 2.0 consists of 5 interrelated phases, of which the first is the contextual inquiry, in which an overview of the involved stakeholders, the current situation, and points of improvement is created. The findings from the contextual inquiry are specified in the value specification, in which the foundation for the to-be-developed eHealth technology is created by formulating values and requirements, preliminarily selecting behavior change techniques and persuasive features, and initiating a business model. In the Design phase, the requirements are translated into several lo-fi and hi-fi prototypes that are iteratively tested with end users and other stakeholders. A version of the technology is rolled out in the Operationalization phase, using the business model and an implementation plan. In the Summative Evaluation phase, the impact, uptake, and working mechanisms are evaluated using a multimethod approach. All phases are interrelated by continuous formative evaluation cycles that ensure coherence between outcomes of phases and alignment with stakeholder needs. While the CeHRes Roadmap 2.0 consists of the same phases as the first version, the objectives and pillars have been updated and adapted, reflecting the increased emphasis on behavior change, implementation, and evaluation as a process. There is a need for more empirical studies that apply and reflect on the CeHRes Roadmap 2.0 to provide points of improvement because just as with any eHealth technology, the Roadmap has to be constantly improved based on the input of its users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.