Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804953›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Benchmarking residue-resolution protein coarse-grained models for simulations of biomolecular condensates.

Alejandro Feito, Ignacio Sanchez-Burgos, Ignacio Tejero, Eduardo Sanz, Antonio Rey, Rosana Collepardo-Guevara, Andrés R Tejedor, Jorge R Espinosa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antibody-drug conjugate engineering: from design to efficacy and safety.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Intrinsic Disorder as a Biomimetic Design Paradigm.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alejandro FeitoDepartment of Physical-Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0000-1282-7580
Ignacio Sanchez-BurgosMaxwell Centre, Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1160-3945
Ignacio TejeroDepartment of Physical-Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0008-2683-1204
Eduardo SanzDepartment of Physical-Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6474-5835
Antonio ReyDepartment of Physical-Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8901-4198
Rosana Collepardo-GuevaraYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1781-7351
Andrés R TejedorDepartment of Physical-Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9437-6169
Jorge R EspinosaDepartment of Physical-Chemistry, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9530-2658

Funding

Derek Brewer scholarship of Emmanuel CollegeEPSRC Doctoral Training Programme studentshipEuropean Research Council (ERC)Roger Ekins Research Fellowship of Emmanuel CollegeSpanish National
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracellular liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins and nucleic acids is a fundamental mechanism by which cells compartmentalize their components and perform essential biological functions. Molecular simulations play a crucial role in providing microscopic insights into the physicochemical processes driving this phenomenon. In this study, we systematically compare six state-of-the-art sequence-dependent residue-resolution models to evaluate their performance in reproducing the phase behaviour and material properties of condensates formed by seven variants of the low-complexity domain (LCD) of the hnRNPA1 protein (A1-LCD)-a protein implicated in the pathological liquid-to-solid transition of stress granules. Specifically, we assess the HPS, HPS-cation-π, HPS-Urry, CALVADOS2, Mpipi, and Mpipi-Recharged models in their predictions of the condensate saturation concentration, critical solution temperature, and condensate viscosity of the A1-LCD variants. Our analyses demonstrate that, among the tested models, Mpipi, Mpipi-Recharged, and CALVADOS2 provide accurate descriptions of the critical solution temperatures and saturation concentrations for the multiple A1-LCD variants tested. Regarding the prediction of material properties for condensates of A1-LCD and its variants, Mpipi-Recharged stands out as the most reliable model. Overall, this study benchmarks a range of residue-resolution coarse-grained models for the study of the thermodynamic stability and material properties of condensates and establishes a direct link between their performance and the ranking of intermolecular interactions these models consider.

Indexed as

Biomolecular CondensatesMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsBenchmarkingComputational BiologyHeterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A1HumansPhase TransitionViscosityHeterogeneous Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein A1Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39804953
PMCPMC11844903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.