ArticlePloS one2025
Equalization of basic public services enabled by digitization: A study of mechanism and heterogeneity.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and influencing factors of hepatitis B incidence rate in China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Does digital economy development enhance Chinese residents' health? Impact and mechanism.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Coupled coordination relationship and enhancement path between digital economy and essential public health services in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digitalization has penetrated into every aspect of life. However, research on the mechanisms through which digitalization affects the equalization of basic public services, as well as the heterogeneity of its impact on different fields of these services, is still insufficient. Based on the panel data of 30 provincial-level administrative regions in China from 2013 to 2023, this paper studies the mechanism and heterogeneity of the impact of digital development on the equalization of basic public services. The research finds that the improvement of the digital development level can significantly promote the equalization process of basic public services, and this finding remains robust after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests. The discussions on regional heterogeneity and spatial complexity show that digitalization makes a greater contribution to the equalization of basic public services in the central and western regions and the northeast than in the east. However, achieving equalization of basic public services across regions through digitalization is challenging. The development of digitalization and the equalization of basic public services are limited by territorial cohesion in geographical space. Underdeveloped regions have poor access to digitalization for achieving equalization of basic public services. This leads to a 'digital divide' between developed and underdeveloped regions. It also results in a 'low-lying area' phenomenon in basic public services. Additionally, the promoting effect of digitalization on the equalization of different areas of basic public services varies significantly. The effect is strongest for basic living services. It is moderate for environmental protection services and education services. The effect on medical services is not significant.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.