ArticlePloS one2025
Association between depression and the prevalence and prognosis of prediabetes: Data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2018.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of technology in prediabetes and precision prevention.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosis and intervention of prediabetes is an emerging approach to preventing the progression and complications of diabetes. Inflammatory factors and dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis have been suggested as potential mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of both diabetes and depression. However, the relationship between depression levels and the prevalence of prediabetes and its prognosis remains elusive. This study aimed to explore the relationship between depression and the prevalence of prediabetes and to further explore the all-cause mortality of different levels of depression in patients with prediabetes.
methodsOur study used a data set from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Participants were initially divided into two groups (depression vs. non-depression) and further stratified by different depression severity levels. We used a weighted multiple logistic regression model to analyze the association between depression and prediabetes prevalence and a Cox regression model to assess all-cause mortality in prediabetic patients.
resultsA total of 4384 participants were included, divided into depression group (n = 1379) and non-depression group (n = 3005). Results showed that people with depression were at higher risk of developing prediabetes. After adjusting for covariates, moderate to severe depression was positively associated with prediabetes (moderate to severe depression vs no depression: OR = 1.834, 95%CI: 0.713-4.721; severe depression vs no depression: OR = 1.004, 95% CI 0.429-2.351). In addition, we explored the relationship between all-cause mortality and depressive status in patients diagnosed with prediabetes (n = 2240) and found that moderate to severe depression (HR = 2.109, 95%CI 0.952-4.670) was associated with higher mortality in patients with prediabetes.
conclusionsOverall, the findings consistently suggest that depression is positively associated with both the prevalence and mortality risk among individuals with prediabetes. This suggests that depression may be a new and valuable indicator of prediabetes risk. Early treatment of depression improves outcomes in prediabetes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.