ArticleGigaScience2025
Data reuse in agricultural genomics research: challenges and recommendations.
Article in GigaScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genomic solutions to metadata challenges: a case study on the 1000 Bull Genomes Project.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in plant salt stress research: from predictive models to multi-omics integration.Journal of experimental botany · 2026Review
- Cookbook for plant genome sequences.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- The future is FAIR: a community framework for enhanced data management and data sharing.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities: computational biology and the future of agriculture.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Order from entropy: big data from FAIR data cohorts in the digital age of plant breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- From data to discovery: leveraging big data in plant natural products biosynthesis research.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- A standards perspective on genomic data reusability and reproducibility.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The scientific community has long benefited from the opportunities provided by data reuse. Recognizing the need to identify the challenges and bottlenecks to reuse in the agricultural research community and propose solutions for them, the data reuse working group was started within the AgBioData consortium framework. Here, we identify the limitations of data standards, metadata deficiencies, data interoperability, data ownership, data availability, user skill level, resource availability, and equity issues, with a specific focus on agricultural genomics research. We propose possible solutions stakeholders could implement to mitigate and overcome these challenges and provide an optimistic perspective on the future of genomics and transcriptomics data reuse.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.