ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
A Comprehensive Analysis of Sex-Biased Gene Expression in the Aging Human Retina Through a Combination of Single-Cell and Bulk RNA Sequencing.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiomic Integration Reveals Novel miRNA-mRNA-Protein Expression Profile in the Aged Female Retina.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Lipid-Retinoid Metabolic Network Links Genetic Variation to Molecular Heterogeneity in Inherited Retinal Degeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Endogenous oestrogens as neuroprotective modulators in the human retina: Evidence from transcriptomic profiling and aromatase inhibition.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2026Article
- Interpretable Aging Signatures in Human Retinal Cell Types Revealed by Single-Cell RNA Sequencing and Sparse Logistic Regression.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Selective deletion ofiScience · 2026Article
- Understanding TAK1 deficiency in microglia: Dual mechanisms for photoreceptor protection in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Female sex hormones exacerbate retinal neurodegeneration.Science advances · 2025Article
- Optical coherence tomography and electroretinography in pituitary macroadenomas: a 12-month analysis by age and tumor type.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Previous studies have reported divergent sexual responses to aging; however, specific variations in gene expression between aging males and females and their potential association with age-related retinal diseases remain unclear. This study collected data from public databases and developed a comprehensive comparison of retina between aging females and males. Methods: Single-cell RNA (scRNA) and bulk RNA sequencing data of the aging retina from females and males in public databases were utilized for integrated analysis to investigate sex-biased expression in retina. Additionally, in vitro experiments were conducted on individuals with retinitis pigmentosa (RP) to validate the sex difference in degenerative retina. Results: Bulk RNA analysis revealed sex-biased expression of specific genes in retina of aging individuals, with immune pathway-related genes exhibiting higher expression in females compared to males. The scRNA analysis demonstrated that sex-biased gene expression was cell-type specific in aging retina. Furthermore, susceptibility genes for age-related macular degeneration and RP exhibited variation across different cell types and sexes. Cell-to-cell communication unveiled an increased interaction associated with TGFB1, CCL7, and VEGFA in Müller glia, microglia, and astrocytes of female retina. Notably, we observed female-biased chemokine expression in microglia contributing to heightened susceptibility to immune inflammation in female retina. Finally, we confirmed a more pronounced inflammatory response during degeneration in female rd10 mouse retina compared to males. Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive comparison of retina between females and males in healthy aging human retina and highlights the significance of sex as an influential factor in retinal diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.