ArticleJournal of vision2025
Estimating the contribution of early and late noise in vision from psychophysical data.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Turing Test for artificial nets devoted to vision.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- A unified framework for perceived magnitude and discriminability of sensory stimuli.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human performance in psychophysical detection and discrimination tasks is limited by inner noise. It is unclear to what extent this inner noise arises from early noise (e.g., in the photoreceptors) or from late noise (at or immediately prior to the decision stage, presumably in cortex). Very likely, the behaviorally limiting inner noise is a nontrivial combination of both early and late noise. Here we propose a method to quantify the contributions of early and late noise purely from psychophysical data. Our approach generalizes classical results for linear systems by combining the theory of noise propagation through a nonlinear network with expressions to obtain a perceptual metric through a nonlinear network. We show that from threshold-only data, the relative contributions of early and late noise can only be disentangled when the experiments include substantial external noise. When full psychometric functions are available, early and late noise sources can be quantified even in the absence of external noise. Our psychophysical estimate of the magnitude of early noise-assuming a standard cascade of linear and nonlinear model stages-is substantially lower than the noise in cone photocurrents computed via an accurate model of retinal physiology, the ISETBio. This is consistent with the idea that one of the fundamental tasks of early vision is to reduce the comparatively large retinal noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.