ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2025
Elevating Dermatology Beyond Aesthetics: Perinatal-Derived Advancements for Rejuvenation, Alopecia Strategies, Scar Therapies, and Progressive Wound Healing.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells and their acellular derivatives in cutaneous wound healing and pathological scarring: a narrative review.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Review
- Nanotechnology-Based Strategies for Hair Regeneration: Mechanistic Insights and Translational Perspectives for Androgenetic Alopecia.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- PM2.5 as a driver of human health disorders: insights from the regulated cell death pathways.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Amelioration of psoriasis-like skin lesions by human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells: insights from multiomics profiling in mice.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Gene therapy for genodermatoses at the crossroads of innovation and clinical translation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Decoding the molecular mechanisms of pyroptosis and its therapeutic development prospects.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Death as rebirth: how efferocytosis drives tissue repair and disease treatment.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatologists have been interested in recent advancements in regenerative therapy. Current research is actively investigating the possibility of placental tissue derivatives to decelerate the skin aging process, enhance skin regeneration, reduce scarring, and prevent hair loss. Amniotic membranes (AM) play a crucial role in regenerative medicine as they serve as a suitable means of transporting stem cells, growth hormones, cytokines, and other essential compounds. Regulating an intricate network of biological processes improves the development and repair of tissues. Studies done by dermatologists indicate that several compounds found in the decidua, umbilical cord, and amniotic membrane have the potential to be used for regeneration. Examples include mesenchymal stem cells, growth factors, and immunomodulatory pharmaceuticals. Due to research and technological developments, scientists may use placental sections to facilitate skin regeneration, minimize scarring, and expedite wound healing. This study examines the current state of dermatological therapy, with a focus on using derivatives obtained from fetal tissue as the basis. The critical areas of study focus on this strategy are the potential benefits, growth opportunities, and recovery rates. Based on a thorough examination of the available literature and clinical data, we want to make definitive conclusions on the possible influence of fetal tissue derivatives in dermatological therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39804520What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.