ReviewArchives of dermatological research2025
Eruptive keratoacanthoma secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitors: a narrative review.
Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pembrolizumab-Induced Eruptive Keratoacanthomas Managed With Intralesional Corticosteroids: A Case Report.Cureus · 2026Article
- Skin Reactions and Other Underappreciated Dermatologic Side Effects of Cancer Therapies.Current treatment options in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of immunotherapy is an emerging treatment option for advanced malignancies. Cutaneous adverse events following cancer immunotherapy are well-documented in the literature. The rarer cutaneous adverse effects are less characterized, including eruptive keratoacanthomas (KA). Despite surgical excision remaining the treatment of choice for KA, several case reports have shown intralesional injections to be an effective, non-invasive treatment modality for this cutaneous adverse event. We reviewed the PubMed database for patients presenting with eruptive KA secondary to immune checkpoint inhibitor use. We also included three previously unpublished cases from our own institution. We identified a total of 19 patients (47.4% male, mean age 78.9 years, range 67-92 years). Patients were treated with intralesional injections, systemic agents, or alternative therapy (n = 7, 5, 7 respectively). Improvement of eruptive KA was observed in 89.5% of patients. Immunotherapy was continued or restarted in 13 of 19 cases. Intralesional injection of triamcinolone or methotrexate resulted in complete resolution in all patients when response was characterized. We believe intralesional injections may be an effective, less invasive treatment option than surgical excision when treating eruptive keratoacanthomas secondary to immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39804491What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.