ArticleArchives of dermatological research2025
Causal relationship between skin microbiota and Hidradenitis suppurativa: a two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Skin microbiota of fallow deer: Composition, diversity, and influencing factors.Veterinary research communications · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Microbiome's Role in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenetic Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundData from observational and clinical studies indicate an association between skin microbiota and hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, the causal relationship between skin microbiota and HS remains to be elucidated.
methodsWe obtained data on skin microbiota and HS from summary statistics of genome-wide association studies and applied Mendelian randomization (MR) statistical methods to assess causality. Specifically, we employed both full MR and inverse MR methods, utilizing five statistical approaches, including inverse variance weighting, to evaluate causality. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the MR findings.
resultsInverse variance weighted analysis revealed that the order Burkholderiales (OR = 0.922, 95% CI 0.855-0.994, P = 0.033), the genus Enhydrobacter (OR = 0.897, 95% CI 0.815-0.986, P = 0.025), ASV037 (OR = 0.926, 95% CI 0.863-0.995, P = 0.036), and ASV016 (OR = 0.932, 95% CI 0.870-0.998, P = 0.043) exhibited a protective effect against HS. Conversely, ASV022 (OR = 1.098, 95% CI 1.027-1.175, P = 0.007) was identified as a risk factor.
conclusionOur analysis suggests a possible causal relationship between specific skin microbiota and HS. These findings shed light on the potential pathogenesis and therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.