Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804478›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2025

The interaction of structured data using openEHR and large Language models for clinical decision support in prostate cancer.

Philippe Kaiser, Shan Yang, Michael Bach, Christian Breit, Kirsten Mertz, Bram Stieltjes, Jan Ebbing, Christian Wetterauer, Maurice Henkel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philippe Kaiser *Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel, 4031, Switzerland. Philippejulien.kaiser@usb.ch.
Shan Yang *Institute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
Michael BachInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
Christian BreitInstitute of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
Kirsten MertzInstitute of Medical Genetics and Pathology, Pathology, University Hospital Basel, Schönbeinstrasse 40, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
Bram StieltjesResearch & Analysis Services, University Hospital Basel, Steinengraben 36, Basel, 4051, Switzerland.
Jan EbbingClinic for Urology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
Christian Wetterauer *Clinic for Urology, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, 4031, Switzerland.
Maurice Henkel *Research & Analysis Services, University Hospital Basel, Steinengraben 36, Basel, 4051, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are essential for cancer care but are resource-intensive. Decision-making processes within MDTs, while critical, contribute to increased healthcare costs due to the need for specialist time and coordination. The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) offers the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of clinical decision-making processes, potentially reducing costs associated with traditional MDT models.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 171 consecutively treated patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Relevant structured clinical data and the European Association of Urology (EAU) pocket guidelines were provided to two LLMs (chatGPT-4, Claude-3-Opus). LLM treatment recommendations were compared to actual treatment recommendations of the MDT meeting (MDM).

resultsBoth LLMs demonstrated an overall adherence of 93% with the MDT treatment recommendations. Discrepancies between LLM and MDT recommendations were observed in 15 cases (9%), primarily due to lack of clinical information that could be provided to the LLMs. In 5 cases (3%), the LLM recommendations were not in line with EAU guidelines despite having access to all relevant information.

conclusionsOur findings provide evidence that LLMs can provide accurate treatment recommendations for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. LLMs have the potential to streamline MDT workflows, enabling specialists to focus on complex cases and patient-centered discussions. In this study, we explored the potential of artificial intelligence models called large language models (LLMs) to assist in treatment decision-making for prostate cancer patients. We found that LLMs, when provided with patient information and clinical guidelines, can recommend treatments that closely match those made by a team of cancer specialists, suggesting that LLMs could help streamline the decision-making process and potentially reduce healthcare costs.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDecision Support Systems, ClinicalProstatic NeoplasmsAgedHumansLarge Language ModelsMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceDecision supportLarge language modelsopenEHRProstate cancerTreatment recommendations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.