ArticleWorld journal of urology2025
The interaction of structured data using openEHR and large Language models for clinical decision support in prostate cancer.
Article in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- [Artificial intelligence as decision support tool in urological oncology: current evidence and challenges].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Pooled it
- Leveraging artificial intelligence to support surgical oncology multidisciplinary team decision-making: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Pooled it
- Applications of large language models in tumor boards: a systematic review.Oncology reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Performance of large language models in ambiguous treatment scenarios of early breast cancer.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2026Article
- Article
- AI-enhanced oncology MDT 2.0: from multi-modal data synergy to value-based care reconstruction - a systematic review of clinical efficacy and socioeconomic benefits.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Evaluating Medical Text Summaries Using Automatic Evaluation Metrics and LLM-as-a-Judge Approach: A Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Large language model integrations in cancer decision-making: a systematic review and meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Assessing LLMs on IDSA Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Comparison Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Medical Diagnostics: Scoping Review With Bibliometric Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMultidisciplinary teams (MDTs) are essential for cancer care but are resource-intensive. Decision-making processes within MDTs, while critical, contribute to increased healthcare costs due to the need for specialist time and coordination. The recent emergence of large language models (LLMs) offers the potential to improve the efficiency and accuracy of clinical decision-making processes, potentially reducing costs associated with traditional MDT models.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective study of 171 consecutively treated patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer. Relevant structured clinical data and the European Association of Urology (EAU) pocket guidelines were provided to two LLMs (chatGPT-4, Claude-3-Opus). LLM treatment recommendations were compared to actual treatment recommendations of the MDT meeting (MDM).
resultsBoth LLMs demonstrated an overall adherence of 93% with the MDT treatment recommendations. Discrepancies between LLM and MDT recommendations were observed in 15 cases (9%), primarily due to lack of clinical information that could be provided to the LLMs. In 5 cases (3%), the LLM recommendations were not in line with EAU guidelines despite having access to all relevant information.
conclusionsOur findings provide evidence that LLMs can provide accurate treatment recommendations for newly diagnosed prostate cancer patients. LLMs have the potential to streamline MDT workflows, enabling specialists to focus on complex cases and patient-centered discussions. In this study, we explored the potential of artificial intelligence models called large language models (LLMs) to assist in treatment decision-making for prostate cancer patients. We found that LLMs, when provided with patient information and clinical guidelines, can recommend treatments that closely match those made by a team of cancer specialists, suggesting that LLMs could help streamline the decision-making process and potentially reduce healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39804478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.