Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804438›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

The Future of Parenthood? Examining the Promise and Complexity of Pregnancy Robots in Reproductive Health.

Rajmohan Seetharaman

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rajmohan SeetharamanDepartment of Pharmacology, MGM Medical College & Hospital, MGM Institute of Health Sciences (MGMIHS), Nerul, Navi Mumbai, 400706, India. rajmohan.seetharaman@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4605-2805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in reproductive technology are now approaching an unprecedented frontier: the pregnancy robot, a potential artificial womb capable of carrying a fetus from fertilization to birth. This innovation, by simulating the natural uterine environment, could redefine pregnancy and parenthood, offering transformative benefits for maternal and infant health. The pregnancy robot promises safer pathways for individuals with medical risks, LGBTQ + couples, and single parents, while also reducing the risks of complications like preeclampsia and preterm birth. It builds on the foundations laid by assisted reproductive technologies (ART), aiming to make the process more accessible and inclusive. However, the introduction of such technology brings with it complex ethical and social questions, including potential impacts on maternal-child bonding, gender roles, and societal norms surrounding motherhood. Further concerns revolve around equitable access, as socioeconomic divides may restrict this technology to those with financial resources, and the risk of cultural and religious opposition. Legal, regulatory, and environmental considerations must also be addressed to responsibly integrate this technology. This article discusses the profound promise and ethical challenges of pregnancy robots, highlighting the need for thoughtful implementation and collaborative dialogue to ensure that the technology, if realized, can benefit all facets of society and pave the way for a more inclusive future in reproductive health.

Indexed as

Reproductive HealthReproductive Techniques, AssistedRoboticsFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.