Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804430›Full record

ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025

Indoor Air Quality in Multi-Family Housing: Drivers and Interventions.

Jonathan I Levy, Kai Kibilko

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan I LevyDepartment of Environmental Health, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St. T4W, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. jonlevy@bu.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-4006
Kai KibilkoBrandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.

Funding

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 84048001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIndoor air pollution is likely to be elevated in multi-family housing and to contribute to health disparities, but limited studies to date have systematically considered the empirical evidence for exposure differentials between multi-family and single-family housing. Our goal is to separately examine the drivers of residential indoor air pollution, including outdoor air pollution, ventilation and filtration, indoor sources, and occupant activity patterns, using secondhand smoke as a case study to examine the behavioral dimensions of indoor environmental interventions. RECENT

findingsWithin studies published from 2018 to 2023, multi-family homes have higher average outdoor air pollution than single-family homes given their more frequent presence in urban and near-roadway settings. Systematic differences in ventilation were principally related to the presence of working kitchen and bathroom exhaust fans, with heterogeneity in overall building infiltration. Indoor sources such as smoking and cooking were more prevalent in multi-family housing, partly because of the influence of adjacent units and shared spaces and partly because source utilization was higher among sociodemographic groups who tend to live in multi-family housing. The literature on smoke-free housing demonstrated that additional steps would be required to reduce exposure to secondhand smoke given some of the challenges associated with smoking cessation. Publications on the drivers of indoor air pollution in multi-family housing reinforce the likelihood of substantial exposure disparities, indicating the urgency of policy measures that address indoor sources and improve ventilation and filtration in a manner that recognizes the complex behavioral dynamics in the home environment.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorEnvironmental ExposureHousingTobacco Smoke PollutionHumansVentilationTobacco Smoke PollutionHousingIndoor airMulti-familyNitrogen DioxideParticulate MatterSecondhand Smoke

Identifiers

PMID39804430
PMCPMC11729057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.