Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804425›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2025

Evaluation of a content-based image retrieval system for radiologists in high-resolution CT of interstitial lung diseases.

Benjamin Böttcher, Marly van Assen, Roberto Fari, Philipp L von Knebel Doeberitz, Eun Young Kim, Eugene A Berkowitz, Felix G Meinel, Carlo N De Cecco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin BöttcherDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Marly van AssenDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Roberto FariDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Philipp L von Knebel DoeberitzDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eun Young KimDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Eugene A BerkowitzDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Felix G MeinelInstitute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Centre Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Carlo N De CeccoDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA. carlo.dececco@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2956-3101

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis retrospective study aims to evaluate the impact of a content-based image retrieval (CBIR) application on diagnostic accuracy and confidence in interstitial lung disease (ILD) assessment using high-resolution computed tomography CT (HRCT).

methodsTwenty-eight patients with verified pattern-based ILD diagnoses were split into two equal datasets (1 and 2). The images were assessed by two radiology residents (3rd and 5th year) and one expert radiologist in four sessions. Dataset 1 was used for sessions A and C, assessing diagnostic accuracy and confidence with mandatory and without CBIR software. Dataset 2 was used for sessions B and D with optional CBIR use, assessing time spending and frequency of CBIR usage. Accuracy was assessed on the CT pattern level, comparing readers' diagnoses with reference diagnoses and CBIR results with region-of-interest (ROI) patterns.

resultsDiagnostic accuracy and confidence of readers showed an increasing trend with CBIR use compared to no CBIR use (53.6% versus 35.7% and 50.0% versus 32.2%, respectively). Time for reading significantly decreased in both datasets (A versus C: 104 s versus 54 s, p < 0.001; B versus D: 88.5 s versus 70 s, p = 0.009), whereas time for research increased with CBIR software use (A versus C: 31 s versus 81 s, p = 0.040). CBIR results showed a high pattern-based accuracy of overall 73.4%. Comparison between readers indicates a slightly higher accuracy of CBIR results when more than one ROI was used as input (77.7% versus 70.1%).

conclusionCBIR software improves in-training radiologist diagnostic accuracy and confidence while reducing interpretation time in ILD assessment. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Content-based image retrieval software improves the assessment of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) in high-resolution CT, especially for radiology residents, by increasing diagnostic accuracy and confidence while reducing interpretation time. This can provide educational benefits and more time-efficient management of complex cases. KEY POINTS: A content-based image retrieval (CBIR) software improves diagnostic accuracy and confidence for in-training radiologists for interstitial lung disease (ILD) assessment on computed tomography (CT). A CBIR application provides condensed information about similar HRCT cases reducing time for ILD assessment. CBIR algorithms benefit from the input of multiple regions of interest per ILD case.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalLung Diseases, InterstitialTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiologistsRetrospective StudiesSoftwareArtificial intelligenceDiagnosis (computer-assisted)Lung diseases (interstitial)Tomography (x-ray computed)

Identifiers

PMID39804425
PMCPMC11729592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.