Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804407›Full record

ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2025

Pain Management Services Can Be a Cost-Effective Option over Surgery for the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Alaa Abd-Elsayed, Max Y Jin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alaa Abd-ElsayedDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53711, USA. alaaawny@hotmail.com.
Max Y JinDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53711, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of commentaryThe number of facilities and physicians that offer pain management services has grown significantly since the 1970s. Despite the rise in prevalence of individuals with chronic pain during that time, interventional pain physicians remain underutilized. One reason why this may be the case is a large number of patients are referred directly to surgical specialists prior to being seen by an interventional pain physician. With the rising cost of healthcare, a shift away from surgical specialists and towards pain specialists as part of a multidisciplinary care team may help reduce the cost of care for chronic pain patients. RECENT

findingsThrough comparing the costs for patients with various types of chronic back pain, it was found that those who were treated by a pain physician rather than a surgeon saved up to over $8000 USD. Despite the cost benefits, it is important to recognize that healthcare disparities still exist which prevent patients from accessing interventional pain physicians. These disparities include patient location and insurance coverage. Overall, the treatment paradigm should start with non-invasive treatments, followed by minimally invasive procedures, with surgical interventions reserved as a last resort for when less invasive measures fail. Early incorporation of a multidisciplinary care team that includes chronic pain management services is critical for providing appropriate and cost-effective patient care.

Indexed as

Chronic PainPain ManagementCost-Benefit AnalysisHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.