ReviewImmunological reviews2025
The Evolving T Cell Receptor Recognition Code: The Rules Are More Like Guidelines.
Review in Immunological reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- T Cell Thoughts.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Bridging model performance and clinical utility in T cell receptor-epitope binding prediction.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Article
- Structure-based TCR-pMHC binding prediction and generalization to unseen peptides.npj drug discovery · 2026Article
- The Role of the T Cell Receptor Sequence in Shaping T Cell Functional Fate.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Structural Remodeling of TCR-HLA-DQ8 Recognition by a β-Cell Stress-Associated C19S Insulin Neoepitope in Type 1 Diabetes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Modeling TCR-Epitope Recognition Specificity: What We Should Learn to Succeed.Immunological reviews · 2026Review
- Advances in predicting T cell epitope recognition for cancer immunotherapy.Nature cancer · 2026Review
- Roads and detours for CAR T cell therapy in autoimmune diseases.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026Review
- Dynamic Allostery in T Cell Receptor Specificity: A Role for Peptides and MHC Polymorphisms in Allosterically Tuning Immune Recognition.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026Review
- TCR repertoire shaping of naïve T cell subsets in human ontogeny.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Establishment of Autoreactive CD4International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
αβ T cell receptor (TCR) recognition of peptide-MHC complexes lies at the core of adaptive immunity, balancing specificity and cross-reactivity to facilitate effective antigen discrimination. Early structural studies established basic frameworks helpful for understanding and contextualizing TCR recognition and features such as peptide specificity and MHC restriction. However, the growing TCR structural database and studies launched from structural work continue to reveal exceptions to common assumptions and simplifications derived from earlier work. Here we explore our evolving understanding of TCR recognition, illustrating how structural and biophysical investigations regularly uncover complex phenomena that push against paradigms and expand our understanding of how TCRs bind to and discriminate between peptide/MHC complexes. We discuss the implications of these findings for basic, translational, and predictive immunology, including the challenges in accounting for the inherent adaptability, flexibility, and occasional biophysical sloppiness that characterize TCR recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.