Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804116›Full record

ReviewThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2024

Ultrasound and blind endometrial sampling for detection of endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding.

Selvi Radhika Vikram, Jonathan Robinson, Tina Thanawala, John Franklin, Shari Boeckstaens, Marcia Hall, Fatai Adegboyega Sanusi, Malcolm Padwick, Paul Stanciu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Endometrial Changes Associated with Mifepristone: A Review.International journal of general medicine · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Selvi Radhika VikramWomen and Children's Services, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, St Albans, UK.
Jonathan RobinsonSchool of Health, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Tina ThanawalaWomen and Children's Services, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK.
John FranklinSchool of Health, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Shari BoeckstaensWomen and Children's Services, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK.
Marcia HallCollege of Life Sciences, Brunel University, Uxbridge, UK.
Fatai Adegboyega SanusiWomen and Children's Services, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK.
Malcolm PadwickWomen and Children's Services, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK.
Paul StanciuWomen and Children's Services, West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (diagnostic). The objectives are as follows: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial sampling with histology in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium on ultrasound. Diagnosis will be verified by the reference standards, hysteroscopy with histology, obtained by targeted (such as grasp biopsy of the endometrium or resection of focal pathology) or global sampling (with dilation and curettage), and histology of hysterectomy specimens. Secondary objectives To determine the diagnostic accuracy of different sampling devices and methods in the detection of endometrial cancer To assess the diagnostic accuracy of endometrial sampling devices and methods to detect endometrial hyperplasia To determine accuracy in diagnosing endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia at different endometrial thicknesses of 3 mm, 4 mm and 5 mm To investigate sources of heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumPostmenopauseUterine HemorrhageBiopsyEndometrial HyperplasiaFemaleHumansHysteroscopySystematic Reviews as TopicUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39804116
PMCPMC11187790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.