Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39804094›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2025

What is the Difference Between the Different Types of Thermometers?

Işıl Kübra Savaş, Gülsüm İclal Bayhan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Importance of Accurately Assessing Hypothermia.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Işıl Kübra SavaşDepartment of General Pediatrics, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Gülsüm İclal BayhanDepartment of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: There is no widely accepted method that can reflect the core temperature exactly. The aim of this study is to investigate the accuracy of frequently used body temperature measurement methods. Materials and Methods: A total of 104 patients aged 3-9 years were included in this cross-sectional study. The body temperature was measured using a non-contact cutaneous thermometer (NCCT), tympanic thermometer (TT), temporal artery thermometer (TAT), and electronic oral thermometer. Four consecutive measurements each with a different technique were taken from each patient. The oral thermometer was accepted as the reference body temperature measurement method and an oral body temperature measurement of ≥37.8°C was accepted as fever. Results: The NCCT and TT provided lower body temperature results than the oral measurement, while the TAT measured body temperatures higher than the oral thermometer. In patients whose temperature was measured as <37.8°C orally, the oral and TT measurements showed a strong positive association, while the other methods showed a weak positive association with the oral thermometer. In patients with fever, the oral and TT, and the oral and NCCT had a strong positive association while the oral thermometer and TAT had a moderate positive association. The result provided by the ROC analysis that was performed to determine the fever cut-off value for NCCT was 37.4°C, 37.7°C for TT, and 38°C for TAT. Conclusion: None of the peripheral measurement methods can accurately measure the core temperature. However, the results can be interpreted more accurately if the characteristics of the thermometers are well known.

Identifiers

PMID39804094
PMCPMC11736856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.