Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803969›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2025

Navigating Work and Breastfeeding: A Qualitative Exploration of Breastfeeding Experiences among Nurses and Support Staff in South India.

Limalemla Jamir, Desham Chelimela, Amrita Datta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Limalemla JamirDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Desham ChelimelaDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Siddipet, Telangana, India.
Amrita DattaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The personal experiences of breastfeeding healthcare workers may influence the quality of breastfeeding support provided. This study explored the breastfeeding experiences of nurses and support staff in South India. Materials and Methods: A qualitative exploratory study using focus group discussions (FGDs) was conducted among nurses and support staff of a newly established tertiary care hospital in South India. Purposive sampling was used, and written consent was obtained. Three FGDs were conducted in English and in local language by trained personnel. Audio recordings were transcribed, coded using Atlas Ti, and analyzed thematically. New themes from each FGD were integrated into later discussions until saturation was achieved in the third FGD. Results: Participants, primarily aged 30-35 years, encountered cultural pressures, fears of job loss, and insufficient workplace support while breastfeeding. Maternity leave varied with some participants having experienced job loss. Facilitators for exclusive breastfeeding included support from colleagues and friends, private lactation rooms, and adequate leave. Harmful cultural practices suggested limited health literacy. Reduced milk supply, lack of awareness about expressed milk, inadequate storage facilities, and job stress led to a preference for bottle feeding. Participants also highlighted a lack of spousal understanding concerning shared responsibilities and sexual intimacy following delivery. They expressed a desire for paid leave with job security, designated breastfeeding areas, and the normalization of public breastfeeding. Conclusion: Breastfeeding challenges for nurses and support staff in South India stem from societal pressures and work demands. This study emphasizes the need for multi-level interventions to empower them in effective breastfeeding practices.

Identifiers

PMID39803969
PMCPMC11736826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.