Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803925›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2025

Detection of odorants in odour mixtures among healthy people and patients with olfactory dysfunction.

Eva Drnovsek, Kristina Weitkamp, Venkatesh N Murthy, Edanur Gurbuz, Antje Haehner, Thomas Hummel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva DrnovsekSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0821-2334
Kristina WeitkampSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Venkatesh N MurthyCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2443-4252
Edanur GurbuzSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Antje HaehnerSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1311-8000
Thomas HummelSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-0183

Funding

Volkswagenstiftung: Olfactorial Perceptronics Az96632Volkswagenstiftung: Olfactorial Perceptronics grantnumber
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target odorant detection in mixtures has been shown to become more difficult as the number of background odorants increases and falls below chance level in mixtures with 16 components. Our aim was to investigate target odorant detection in mixtures among healthy people and compare it between dysosmic patients and age- and gender-matched controls. Participants underwent extensive olfactory testing and performed two target odorant detection tasks. Eugenol ('clove') and phenylethanol (PEA, 'rose') were target odorants for all participants, whereas a third target was randomised. For each target odorant in task one (task two), there were four steps. Mixtures contained two (three) odorants in the first step and up to seven (eight) odorants in the fourth step. In each step, participants were asked to choose the sample with the target odorant from the three (two) jars presented. The study included 90 healthy people and 40 patients. As expected, probability of successful target odorant detection decreased as the number of odorants in the mixture increased. However, even when there were seven (eight) odorants in the mixture, around 50% (50%) of healthy people detected Eugenol and around 30% (40%) detected PEA. Furthermore, both distributions of successful target odorant detection differed from the expected binominal distribution of chance (p < 0.001). Patients performed worse at detecting Eugenol or PEA at each step than controls. Furthermore, there were significant positive correlations between task scores and olfactory function. In conclusion, target odorant detection is influenced by the target odorant, number of background odorants, and individual olfactory function.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfaction DisordersOlfactory PerceptionSmellAdultAgedEugenolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenylethyl AlcoholEugenolPhenylethyl Alcoholanalytical perceptionelemental perceptionnoseolfactionsmell

Identifiers

PMID39803925
PMCPMC11727005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.