Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39803892›Full record

Observational studyJMIR medical informatics2025

Effectiveness of the Facility for Elderly Surveillance System (FESSy) in Two Public Health Center Jurisdictions in Japan: Prospective Observational Study.

Junko Kurita, Motomi Hori, Sumiyo Yamaguchi, Aiko Ogiwara, Yurina Saito, Minako Sugiyama, Asami Sunadori, Tomoko Hayashi, Akane Hara, Yukari Kawana and 5 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR medical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Junko KuritaDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Sports & Health Science, Daito Bunka University, Higashimatsuyama-shi, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1829-8573
Motomi HoriSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-9947-338X
Sumiyo YamaguchiTsuchiura Public Health Center, Tsuchiura City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-6158-4907
Aiko OgiwaraSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-4623-6316
Yurina SaitoTsuchiura Public Health Center, Tsuchiura City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-0499-0491
Minako SugiyamaSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0005-2323-0671
Asami SunadoriSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0005-4139-0943
Tomoko HayashiSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0008-9768-6454
Akane HaraSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-9797-5610
Yukari KawanaSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0001-5727-8279
Youichi ItoiSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0009-0002-9560-567X
Tamie SugawaraNational Institute of Infectious Diseases, Shinjuku City, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8632-8618
Yoshiyuki SugishitaSumida City Public Health Center, Sumida City, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9044-5091
Fujiko IrieTsuchiura Public Health Center, Tsuchiura City, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9074-2213
Naomi SakuraiCenter for Medical Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ami-machi, Japan.ORCID 0009-0007-5819-8979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Residents of facilities for older people are vulnerable to COVID-19 outbreaks. Nevertheless, timely recognition of outbreaks at facilities for older people at public health centers has been impossible in Japan since May 8, 2023, when the Japanese government discontinued aggressive countermeasures against COVID-19 because of the waning severity of the dominant Omicron strain. The Facility for Elderly Surveillance System (FESSy) has been developed to improve information collection. Objective: This study examined FESSy experiences and effectiveness in two public health center jurisdictions in Japan. Methods: This study assessed the use by public health centers of the detection mode of an automated AI detection system (ie, FESSy AI), as well as manual detection by the public health centers' staff (ie, FESSy staff) and direct reporting by facilities to the public health centers. We considered the following aspects: (1) diagnoses or symptoms, (2) numbers of patients as of their detection date, and (3) ultimate numbers of patients involved in incidents. Subsequently, effectiveness was assessed and compared based on detection modes. The study lasted from June 1, 2023, through January 2024. Results: In both areas, this study examined 31 facilities at which 87 incidents were detected. FESSy (AI or staff) detected significantly fewer patients than non-FESSy methods, that is, direct reporting to the public health center of the detection date and ultimate number of patients. Conclusions: FESSy was superior to direct reporting from facilities for the number of patients as of the detection date and for the ultimate outbreak size.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedAged, 80 and overHumansJapanProspective StudiesPublic HealthSARS-CoV-2early detectionfacility for older peopleJapanolder adultsoutbreakpublic health centersyndromic surveillance

Identifiers

PMID39803892
PMCPMC11741194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.