ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2025
Deep Learning and Numerical Analysis for Bladder Outflow Obstruction and Detrusor Underactivity Diagnosis in Men: A Novel Urodynamic Evaluation Scheme.
Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for urodynamic studies: systematic review of methods, performance, and clinical applications.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction and spinal cord injury: current status, emerging technologies, and ethical perspectives.Frontiers in urology · 2026Article
- Smartphone-AI videouroflowmetry evaluation (SAVE study): a concordance study with standard uroflowmetry.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence for diagnosing bladder pathophysiology: An updated review and future prospects.Bladder (San Francisco, Calif.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo automatically identify and diagnose bladder outflow obstruction (BOO) and detrusor underactivity (DUA) in male patients with lower urinary tract symptoms through urodynamics exam. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective review of 1949 male patients who underwent a urodynamic study at two institutions. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks scheme combined with a short-time Fourier transform algorithm was trained to perform an accurate diagnosis of BOO and DUA, utilizing five-channel urodynamic data (consisting of uroflowmetry, urine volume, intravesical pressure, abdominal pressure, and detrusor pressure). We used fivefold cross-validation, constructing training and internal test sets from 1725 patients from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University (RHWU) at a 4:1 ratio, and used an independent external validation set consisting of 224 patients from The Central Hospital of Wuhan (TCHO) to build and evaluate the DI model. We further conducted subgroup analyses to provide a more detailed description of the AI model's interpretability regarding urodynamics.
resultsThe AUC scores of BOO and DUA, which were measured through the STFT-based deep learning method, were 0.945 ± 0.020 and 0.929 ± 0.039 in RHWU and 0.881 and 0.850 in TCHO, respectively. The diagnostic efficiency of other subgroup analyses and indicators was also effective.
conclusionIn this study, the proposed deep neural network combined with the short-time Fourier transform method is robust and feasible for interpreting the results of urodynamics in men and has the potential for application to assist clinicians in real clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.